Tre Wisner take

[NothinButDaHorns34]

35 minutes ago, HookemFromOkc said:

I think we will be just fine with Brown, Smothers, and Terry. 

Very bold list without RB3 derrek copper and a guy running RB5 in MTIII

[Here for the Wins]

1 hour ago, awashbump said:

His big performances were the result of the blocking scheme against A&M and OU. With a real RB1, both A&M games are 20-30 pt blowouts 

Goodness gracious.  4th and Five we need some prayers for some of these dudes.

[Jonas Peterson]

2 hours ago, HookemFromOkc said:

I think we will be just fine with Brown, Smothers, and Terry. 

I think Cooper is way ahead of Terry.

[Assistant Regional Manager]

Water eventually finds its level. If he was as good as some made him out to be, he wouldn’t be at Florida State.

Sounds harsh, but it’s true.

Edited 11 hours ago by Assistant Regional Manager

[awashbump]

2 hours ago, Here for the Wins said:

Goodness gracious.  4th and Five we need some prayers for some of these dudes.

?

[Here for the Wins]

Just now, awashbump said:

?

Thought maybe you were having a stroke or something.  20-30 points more without Wisner is interesting.

[whereiend]

Tre had great vision on the outside zone but he was slow and couldn't break a tackle to save his life. Usually you want your RB to at least have one of those abilities.

[HudGar1922]

17 hours ago, hookemrj13 said:

Tre Wisner was fine and is fine. 

I feel his demise at Texas was the lack of a 2nd RB that was also a threat.

He was not a "problem" when Blue was part of the duo.

All of Sark's RB's at Texas have had a duo system, and I feel Wisner was a victim of missing that last year...along with the OL trouble...along with some playcalling. 

I like the 2 RB's we got (esp Smothers imo) but feel like Wisner could have had a impact as well. 

Was the NIL asking price that far off?

he was good for 5 or 6 games in his career.   we upgraded significantly,  lets move on