TTown Posted September 3 Posted September 3 From Dellenger- https://x.com/RossDellenger/status/2095557380574470371?s=20 2 Quote
TTown Posted September 3 Posted September 3 The judge did rule earlier today that only 7 athletes of the 44 have standing in regards to this lawsuit. So a win for SEC there ha! Sankey is there and on the stand as well it seems. 2 Quote
Gerald Nash Posted September 3 Posted September 3 20 hours ago, THookem said: Leave it to Kiffin and crew to burn it down. 1 Quote
HonkEm Posted September 3 Posted September 3 17 hours ago, Bobby Burton said: He meets the SEC rules. Yep, he meets the SEC rules - that part’s solid. Texas already checked with the SEC, the NCAA, and a floating council of ancient star‑monks who drift through the universe deciding offensive‑line eligibility. The SEC has spoken. The galaxies have aligned. Hutson is eligible in this dimension and at least three parallel ones. 1 3 Quote
HonkEm Posted September 3 Posted September 3 Also, thks @THookem for all your posts here. Very informational 3 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted September 3 Posted September 3 59 minutes ago, TTown said: From Dellenger- https://x.com/RossDellenger/status/2095557380574470371?s=20 Quote
TTown Posted September 3 Posted September 3 So assuming this judge rules in favor of players today, and I assume that . Comes down to LSU really wanting to defy and possibly get all the wrath of the SEC. Hell of a risk to take for all their players, who may end up playing for nothing this year. Surely there is one adult in the room that says nah , not worth it. Same situation as Tech in a lot of ways. Hell I love it though. The penalties will be awesome to watch. 4 Quote
nineliveslost Posted September 3 Posted September 3 I read that some are lumping Cole in the party because he got paid a couple hundred bucks for try outs in the pros, therefore he disqualifies. I have no clue , its just a cluster to me 1 Quote
GoHorns1 Posted September 3 Posted September 3 This exactly what I predicted the SEC could do.. Same type of filing as the Big XII Quote
TTown Posted September 3 Posted September 3 https://x.com/TomMarsLaw/status/2095573329914597692?s=20 Quote
BurntOrangeHorn Posted September 3 Posted September 3 27 minutes ago, TTown said: So assuming this judge rules in favor of players today, and I assume that . Comes down to LSU really wanting to defy and possibly get all the wrath of the SEC. Hell of a risk to take for all their players, who may end up playing for nothing this year. Surely there is one adult in the room that says nah , not worth it. Same situation as Tech in a lot of ways. Hell I love it though. The penalties will be awesome to watch. If this 💩show does not give Royal pause, then I have misjudged his maturity! What say you @Gerry & @Bobby and anyone else?? This cannot exist in its own vacuum jar for Royal!! Probability for Texas signing has to be near 75% now! 🤘🏻🤘🏼🤘🤘🏽🤘🏾🤘🏿 Quote
VaHorn Posted September 3 Posted September 3 (edited) I assume this will look like Sidley’s lawsuit for the big 12. Edited September 3 by VaHorn Quote
TTown Posted September 3 Posted September 3 (edited) Somewhat related in all this mess. The Speaker of the House said they will adjourn Sept 17 until after the election. Have cancelled all votes however until then . Evidently don't want to have to vote on certain things and leave it at that. Don't wanna get political. Unless that changes, no way PSA Act gets done . Even if Senate passes it. Doubt the Senate even takes it up again now considering that move.So more of the Courts merry-go-round for awhile longer. So will see what's next from the judges and Courts ha! Edited September 3 by TTown 1 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted September 3 Posted September 3 44 minutes ago, THookem said: One opinion from LSU You can’t make this up. 😂 Quote
Longhornlove Posted September 3 Posted September 3 20 hours ago, horns96 said: I've been listening to a lot of national folks since the Sorsby fiasco began. "Yeah, but Texas and Cole Hutson" is becoming a common retort to these discussions. I know @Bobby Burton disagrees, but as Andy Stapes said yesterday, trying to say Cole Hutson wasn't a pro because he didn't sign a contract is "a distinction without a difference". I'm curious, do we know if Cole took any money for expenses during his invited tryouts? Weird, I've never seen a "volunteer" professional athlete. Don't you typically get paid to be considered a professional at something? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.