Michael Chasnoff Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago According to Google's AI ... Roughing the Passer Does Not Apply to Laterals Under NCAA Rule 2-19-2, a pass is only a forward pass if it initially travels toward the opponent's goal line. Because a lateral travels parallel or backward, it is a backward pass, and NCAA Rule 9-1-9 (Roughing the Passer) explicitly does not apply. With a non call, we intercept the pass and win the game. Quote
ClubWhatever Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago The roughing call wasn’t on the backward pass it was on the forward pass. Quote
Michael Chasnoff Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago It was definitely a double pass. The receiver passed the ball following a backward pass. Quote
ClubWhatever Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago So there cannot be roughing on a flea flicker where the QB pitches it back and then it’s pitched back to him? Of course there can. Sorry, you are wrong. 3 Quote
Michael Chasnoff Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago Look, I don't know which play you are referring to but I'm questioning the following trick play... Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer threw a legal backward lateral to wide receiver Isaiah Sategna. Sategna was just a receiver catching a lateral... and therefore NCAA Rule 9-1-9 (Roughing the Passer) explicitly does not apply. 1 2 Quote
hookem1014 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Michael Chasnoff said: Look, I don't know which play you are referring to but I'm questioning the following trick play... Oklahoma quarterback John Mateer threw a legal backward lateral to wide receiver Isaiah Sategna. Sategna was just a receiver catching a lateral... and therefore NCAA Rule 9-1-9 (Roughing the Passer) explicitly does not apply. Roughing the passer can be called in favor of anyone passing the ball vertically. It doesn’t have to be just for the QB. In this case it was called because of Biles hit on Sategna following his throw. 2 Quote
Longhorns1 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago He was in the air and coming down when the ball was released. He may be able to soften the blow, but where was he supposed to land? 2 Quote
Fritztownhorn Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I agree, he was Airborne before the release. Not sure what he was supposed to do. Quote
Lahorns2001 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Referees did not beat Texas . Our undisciplined play, is what beat Texas Texas is an undisciplined team. That is on Sark along with his terrible play calling. Quote
Wentwood Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Yes Ref’s wee not the issue but I thought the roughing the passer and PI against Phillips were bad calls. He called roughing because Biles hit him hard IMO. Bad call Quote
watty7796 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Wentwood said: Yes Ref’s wee not the issue but I thought the roughing the passer and PI against Phillips were bad calls. He called roughing because Biles hit him hard IMO. Bad call Biles had already left his feet prior to the pass. Kinda hard to change trajectory at that point. He was committed already. Quote
ClubWhatever Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago Sark said he was told the roughing penalty was for hitting the passer in the head. Quote
Oldest Horn Posted 44 minutes ago Posted 44 minutes ago 11 hours ago, Fritztownhorn said: I agree, he was Airborne before the release. Not sure what he was supposed to do. Not throw his arms into the passer’s head and neck area, for starters. 1 Quote
cmk4pres Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago Stop crying about refs when we gift them 17 points. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.