Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, pinkman_90 said:

😞.  You’re too far gone.  Sad 

I know. Watching take after take of Arch’s continued misfires has gone a number on me. But, sure thing, Sark’s concepts are dated.😆

Posted
49 minutes ago, pinkman_90 said:

I mean this is just wrong.  The blinders some of you people have

No, you are dead wrong. The scheme is getting people open. There are just people not doing their jobs.

The only thing you might have an argument with Sark on his his lack of flexibility in the play call. He should let Arch change the play when he sees the defense shift into an overload because he doesn't have enough blockers to handle it. If his routes are deep, then he's dead meat. The scheme is fine. Sark needs to tweak a few things to give the QB more flexibility to counter what he is seeing. 

Again, the main problem is his players not doing their jobs.

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, mmdaytontexas said:

No, you are dead wrong. The scheme is getting people open. There are just people not doing their jobs.

The only thing you might have an argument with Sark on his his lack of flexibility in the play call. He should let Arch change the play when he sees the defense shift into an overload because he doesn't have enough blockers to handle it. If his routes are deep, then he's dead meat. The scheme is fine. Sark needs to tweak a few things to give the QB more flexibility to counter what he is seeing. 

Again, the main problem is his players not doing their jobs.

 

What about all the non passing plays or plays not featured there? That video is a glimpse of part of the issue, that video isn’t definitive proof it’s all arch. 
 

what is our best blocking scheme? Why do we jump around with blocking schemes within the confines of this offense? There is more to scheme than just passing downs. 

Edited by Rockin TL
Posted
1 minute ago, Rockin TL said:

What about all the non passing plays or plays not featured there? That video is a glimpse of part of the issue, that video isn’t definitive proof it’s all arch. 
 

what is our best blocking scheme? Why do we jump around with blocking schemes within the confines of this offense? There is more to scheme than just passing downs. 

Imagine if Arch hit just half of those dozen or so plays Browne covered. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rockin TL said:

People truly only want to focus on the Arch aspect of the offense, not this stuff.

Why is Wingo blocking a guy 4 yards off the ball and not the guy in front of him? I’m not blaming wingo but center gets blitzing middle linebacker and everyone else on left side of the line gets the guy in front and 2 the right. We need 2 yards. If arch keeps it then rb blocks the guy in front of wingo or runs to the flat taking him with him and arch has no one accounting for him. Need hat on hat. Who makes the blocking calls on that? Center? Arch isn’t helping from my understanding. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, mmdaytontexas said:

No, you are dead wrong. The scheme is getting people open. There are just people not doing their jobs.

The only thing you might have an argument with Sark on his his lack of flexibility in the play call. He should let Arch change the play when he sees the defense shift into an overload because he doesn't have enough blockers to handle it. If his routes are deep, then he's dead meat. The scheme is fine. Sark needs to tweak a few things to give the QB more flexibility to counter what he is seeing. 

Again, the main problem is his players not doing their jobs.

 

When you lie at least own up to it.  Remind me who the center was double teaming 

Posted
1 minute ago, Oldest Horn said:

So people aren’t open? Thanks for the hot take. 

Yup arch misses open guys.  Once again find where I said arch is blameless (you won’t).  
 

The core offensive scheme is broken.  And I say core very lightly because we don’t have a core scheme or identity.  

Posted

You people are killing me. When the offense is this bad, it's basically everyone's fault, but it ultimately falls on one person. The one who is not only the OC but also the head coach. Even if all of our problems were 100% tied to Arch, then the obvious question would be "Then why the hell is he still the quarterback?". 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pinkman_90 said:

image.thumb.png.802cd6a37553196238b2e202584990c2.png
 

so who is the center double teaming again?

If this is a run, then both the right guard and the right tackle blew their assignment. They both should be blocking down on the player in their inside gap. 
 

Probably a bad play call as well, too many orange helmets to block and not enough white helmets.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Rockin TL said:

What about all the non passing plays or plays not featured there? That video is a glimpse of part of the issue, that video isn’t definitive proof it’s all arch. 

That video is absolute proof it's mostly on Arch, and the OL that is getting worse each game. Guys are open and no one is blocking well. That is not a scheme issue. Here is another film study that shows the busted assignments were the cause of this loss, and not scheme.

Again, the only thing that Sark can do is tweak his offense to give his QBs the ability to change plays when they see blitzes or overloads coming. But no scheme is going to work if players are busting assignments.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.