Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Truth is, Steve Sarkisian offense has turned stale... As hard as it is to say, it seems dated. 
No QB audibles... What is this, Little League? 

The offense is degrading; Arch is degrading... because Sark will not let go. 

Sark comes off as a coach still riding the high of 2020 and has NEVER evolved his offense. 

Yes, Arch is shot, but it makes NO FREAKIN' SENSE why the O-line continues to suck. I think I'm accepting the fact

that we are not very good because Steve Sarkisian is not evolving.

After the script is done, he quits! He's being outcoached by FIRST-YEAR HEAD COACHES in the SEC with key players out!  

I'm sorry, I'm over it, over him... but looking back, it's a reason we lost to Washington 2 years in a row; it's a reason we lost to Georgia back-to-back seasons. 

Our offense has been exposed, and what we are trying to do is easily defendable. 

Sark is cooked, and because of that, Texas is cooked as long as he is the OC. Because he's not folding, cut ties if the season continues to tank. 

Winning looks easier for KENTUCKY!

Sark has been Shawn Watson bad, with Charlie Strong incompetence, and Tom Herman stubbornness. 

 

Edited by Levester White
  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

He is scheming players open and Arch isn't seeing it.  if Arch had made half the throws that he should have, this offense would look COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The offense is garbage and our QB is playing like garbage in the garbage offense. Also the OL is generally garbage.

Now, how do you uncouple all of that and assign blame? At this point I have no idea, other than the guy in charge of the offense will probably be out of work soon. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Rocky P said:

He is scheming players open and Arch isn't seeing it.  if Arch had made half the throws that he should have, this offense would look COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.  

And there are equal amount of plays (in fact more but I’ll say equal to be conservative) where the plays are DOA because the defense knows how to manipulate the predetermined read or can completely blow it up via the blitz.  

Posted
28 minutes ago, pinkman_90 said:

And there are equal amount of plays (in fact more but I’ll say equal to be conservative) where the plays are DOA because the defense knows how to manipulate the predetermined read or can completely blow it up via the blitz.  

What plays specifically? How is the scheme at fault and not the players blowing assignments? I hear these general indictments about scheme and play calling, but I don't see the evidence. Yeah, a play doesn't work because a defense did a twist or blitz, but no scheme is going to stop that. The OL have to adjust and make the block.

We should blame Sark for his lack of holding his players and coaches responsible and accountable for doing their jobs badly, but unless we can specifically show play call or scheme deficiencies, then we shouldn't make general indictments about the play calls or scheme.

IMG_20261019_182733.jpg.a208b5a4223180413c5e87c38c42300d.jpg

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mmdaytontexas said:

What plays specifically? How is the scheme at fault and not the players blowing assignments? I hear these general indictments about scheme and play calling, but I don't see the evidence. Yeah, a play doesn't work because a defense did a twist or blitz, but no scheme is going to stop that. The OL have to adjust and make the block.

We should blame Sark for his lack of holding his players and coaches responsible and accountable for doing their jobs badly, but unless we can specifically show play call or scheme deficiencies, then we shouldn't make general indictments about the play calls or scheme.

IMG_20261019_182733.jpg.a208b5a4223180413c5e87c38c42300d.jpg

I can keep these coming but I’ll start with the one that lost us the game.  

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.