Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Sunday at 10:00 PM Moderators Posted Sunday at 10:00 PM Was told about 20 minutes ago that Texas is expected to see a basketball all together NIL increase into the 4.8-5 million range for next season. This season's roster was 3.7-3.8 million. That increase would place Texas in the top 15 range nationally based on numbers currently. 33 Quote
Huskie1 Posted Sunday at 10:02 PM Posted Sunday at 10:02 PM That should make a difference if the next staff uses it wisely. Quote
bierce Posted Sunday at 10:04 PM Posted Sunday at 10:04 PM 1 minute ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Was told about 20 minutes ago that Texas is expected to see a basketball all together NIL increase into the 4.8-5 million range for next season. This season's roster was 3.7-3.8 million. That increase would place Texas in the top 15 range nationally based on numbers currently. Is that top 15 based on 2024-25 outlays or estimated 2025-26 outlays, because something tells me that we won't be the only school upping our NIL for basketball by a 20-25%. 2 Quote
Huskie1 Posted Sunday at 10:05 PM Posted Sunday at 10:05 PM Just now, bierce said: Is that top 15 based on 2024-25 outlays or estimated 2025-26 outlays, because something tells me that we won't be the only school upping our NIL for basketball by a 20-25%. Great point. Quote
Realist Horn Posted Sunday at 10:11 PM Posted Sunday at 10:11 PM on top of what the will be allocated from the House Settlement? Quote
Beard N Balls Bundle Posted Sunday at 10:12 PM Posted Sunday at 10:12 PM 11 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Was told about 20 minutes ago that Texas is expected to see a basketball all together NIL increase into the 4.8-5 million range for next season. This season's roster was 3.7-3.8 million. That increase would place Texas in the top 15 range nationally based on numbers currently. CDC going all in in every sport 2 Quote
qaertyisthatdude Posted Sunday at 10:16 PM Posted Sunday at 10:16 PM 2 minutes ago, Beard N Balls Bundle said: CDC going all in in every sport Those annual town hall meetings aren’t for nothing 2 Quote
Assistant Regional Manager Posted Sunday at 10:18 PM Posted Sunday at 10:18 PM 6 minutes ago, Realist Horn said: on top of what the will be allocated from the House Settlement? Basketball isn’t getting much from the house settlement. I’m assuming that number will be the total. Quote
McCoyColt Posted Sunday at 10:22 PM Posted Sunday at 10:22 PM (edited) Pretty solid. Results will only up those numbers Edited Sunday at 10:22 PM by McCoyColt Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Sunday at 10:24 PM Author Moderators Posted Sunday at 10:24 PM 19 minutes ago, bierce said: Is that top 15 based on 2024-25 outlays or estimated 2025-26 outlays, because something tells me that we won't be the only school upping our NIL for basketball by a 20-25%. Expected to be top 15 range 2 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Sunday at 10:24 PM Author Moderators Posted Sunday at 10:24 PM 12 minutes ago, Realist Horn said: on top of what the will be allocated from the House Settlement? Not on top of, no. Total range expected Quote
pinkman_90 Posted Sunday at 10:37 PM Posted Sunday at 10:37 PM Should be good for about 3 more Indiana St JAGs 5 Quote
Hashtag Posted Sunday at 10:37 PM Posted Sunday at 10:37 PM 10 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Not on top of, no. Total range expected Doesn’t seem ideal if that’s total including revenue sharing. That’s only 1-1.5 million extra according to what most teams plans to allocate to revenue sharing for men’s basketball. Good luck with that I guess especially if top programs and teams add more than that on top Quote
CoachBobbyFinstock Posted Sunday at 10:44 PM Posted Sunday at 10:44 PM (edited) Winning can increase NIL but that’s a good start. I will say that it appears Texas wants to be good but not great in hoops. I’m a little surprised but not disappointed. It seems as though, Texas is clearly showing football and baseball are higher priorities. Edited Sunday at 10:47 PM by CoachBobbyFinstock Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Sunday at 10:46 PM Author Moderators Posted Sunday at 10:46 PM 7 minutes ago, Hashtag said: Doesn’t seem ideal if that’s total including revenue sharing. That’s only 1-1.5 million extra according to what most teams plans to allocate to revenue sharing for men’s basketball. Good luck with that I guess especially if top programs and teams add more than that on top It's going to be 2-2.2 mill more. Nate Oats was recently told his rev share was going to be 2-2.2 mill ... he lost his shizznit from what two other college coaches told me. Bama will make it up in a similar fashion. 3 Quote
Hashtag Posted Sunday at 10:49 PM Posted Sunday at 10:49 PM (edited) 7 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: It's going to be 2-2.2 mill more. Nate Oats was recently told his rev share was going to be 2-2.2 mill ... he lost his shizznit from what two other college coaches told me. Bama will make it up in a similar fashion. Tech is on record of saying their revenue share will be 3.5 million. A few other programs been in that ball park. UCONN is estimating 5 million from revenue sharing(not including NIL) Edited Sunday at 10:54 PM by Hashtag Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Sunday at 10:58 PM Author Moderators Posted Sunday at 10:58 PM 6 minutes ago, Hashtag said: Tech is on record of saying their revenue share will be 3.5 million. A few other programs been in that ball park. UCONN is estimating 5 million from revenue sharing(not including NIL) Of course UConn will try ... they won't compete in football with their rev share #'s. And BTW, a lot of the numbers are inflated. 2 Quote
Hashtag Posted Sunday at 10:59 PM Posted Sunday at 10:59 PM Just now, Gerry Hamilton said: Of course UConn will try ... they won't compete in football with their rev share #'s. And BTW, a lot of the numbers are inflated. Those numbers are directly from Texas techs athletic director. Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted Sunday at 11:04 PM Author Moderators Posted Sunday at 11:04 PM 4 minutes ago, Hashtag said: Those numbers are directly from Texas techs athletic director. Absolutely they are. 1 Quote
pinkman_90 Posted Sunday at 11:05 PM Posted Sunday at 11:05 PM Honestly, this number is fine. Pretty much in line with the Miller hire which was…. fine. Quote
Jordan91 Posted Sunday at 11:06 PM Posted Sunday at 11:06 PM 21 minutes ago, CoachBobbyFinstock said: Winning can increase NIL but that’s a good start. I will say that it appears Texas wants to be good but not great in hoops. I’m a little surprised but not disappointed. It seems as though, Texas is clearly showing football and baseball are higher priorities. Not surprised at all. Quote
Ojeezy Posted Sunday at 11:12 PM Posted Sunday at 11:12 PM Texas being in the top 15-20 in basketball NIL is pretty good and about what I would expect personally. This is a football school first and always will be. We also happen to have the best baseball program of all time, so it’s hard to make an argument basketball should be top 5 in the country or anything. There are ~350 college basketball programs. Top 15-20 should allow us to be competitive in the SEC. 1 Quote
NothinButDaHorns34 Posted Sunday at 11:50 PM Posted Sunday at 11:50 PM 1 hour ago, pinkman_90 said: Should be good for about 3 more Indiana St JAGs Yet somehow our former coach thought they were good enough to play significant minutes on his team Quote
Ojeezy Posted Monday at 12:16 AM Posted Monday at 12:16 AM 24 minutes ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said: Yet somehow our former coach thought they were good enough to play significant minutes on his team I have a feeling if our former coach was given the funds to go get JT Toppin we wouldn’t have had to suffer through the Jayson Kent experience. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.