Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted

I am still wondering a bit what the plan for him would be. 

Probably a 6.5 considering he did just have 7.0 sacks last year. More than 2x the next highest sack-getter on Stanford a year ago, and in this Texas front seven, he would be doubled exactly 0 times next fall. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted

4.5 - I'm glad he's interested, but is the marginal increase in what he would provide worth what we will need to pay to get him here? 

I'll trust the staff, but this is the deepest spot on our team, and adding another body doesn't seem add a ton to what we currently have. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

I am still wondering a bit what the plan for him would be. 

Probably a 6.5 considering he did just have 7.0 sacks last year. More than 2x the next highest sack-getter on Stanford a year ago, and in this Texas front seven, he would be doubled exactly 0 times next fall. 

The plan would be to destroy opposing QBs and have ultimate pass rushing depth.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
47 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

On scale of 1-10 ...

TEN 

One of your competitors just published a video in which they described Bailey as a “backup” and compared him to Ovie Oghoufo and Ben Davis as an edge prospect. On a scale of one to ten, how laughable is that assessment of David Bailey?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

On scale of 1-10 ...

TEN 

That surprises me.  You must really be high on him, because to get him means NIL money gets spent and you risk a promising edge hitting the portal.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That surprises me.  You must really be high on him, because to get him means NIL money gets spent and you risk a promising edge hitting the portal.

And therein lies the beauty of the transfer portal.  You can risk losing a promising edge seeking more playing time but at the same time bring in a productive edge looking to boost his NFL draft stock at a more established Power 4 program.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That surprises me.  You must really be high on him, because to get him means NIL money gets spent and you risk a promising edge hitting the portal.

We are planning to rotate guys a lot this season due to length of season including playoff and CCG. You can never have too much quality depth especially at the most critical to success position on defense, pass rusher.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted
6 hours ago, Hashtag said:

We are planning to rotate guys a lot this season due to length of season including playoff and CCG. You can never have too much quality depth especially at the most critical to success position on defense, pass rusher.

Thanks Demon Possessed Bobby for well reasoned response.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 4/1/2025 at 1:57 PM, Quinncent McManning, Jr. said:

6 for me. 8 if it means he doesn’t go to an sec rival 

chance seems low. 3?  
 

would have to rename the nascar package to something more fitting. Formula 1 front with Simmons, Bailey, Hill, Moore, and Terry?  Sheesh 

Spence 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.