Jump to content

March Madness Report: Huge opportunity in Waco (Monday 11:30 a.m. CST)


Recommended Posts

Team completely lost focus once Baylor went to a 1-3-1 and Disu went down. Very bad offensive sets and poor defensive rotations. 

Teams that make runs in the tourney can't lose focus like this. This team is close but not quite good enough outside of Abmas who can't win it by himself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Neil Leininger said:

Season is over if Disu tore his ACL like it looked like.

With Disu the absolute upside would be sweet 16, without, win one is the best. Makes a huge difference but this bunch wasn’t going too far anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hermanator said:

Team completely lost focus once Baylor went to a 1-3-1 and Disu went down. Very bad offensive sets and poor defensive rotations. 

Teams that make runs in the tourney can't lose focus like this. This team is close but not quite good enough outside of Abmas who can't win it by himself. 

Coaching does matter, you hire a coach with a mediocre resume and you get what you saw on paper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Zero chance to make noise without Disu. And just when Texas was starting to play their best/maximize what they have, of course. 

Disu overcame stomach bug only to injure his knee?!? Poor kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Robert Maislin said:

@Gerry Hamilton, what % of UT disappointing on the hard wood this year has been a lacking roster vs Terry not being up for the challenge of the job in game?

 

Couldn't help but notice he again chose to not utilize a TO as we let the game slip away last night on Baylor's big 20-4 run.

Not Gerry but I think RT did well with the roster we have. The freshman both bailing really hurt the roster construction, and Shedrick/Weaver/Disu all being hurt during the offseason hurt as well. 
 

IMO we need to see how this offseason goes and how next season turns out. If he can get a good team next year between returning players/freshman signees/portal players than he may have a shot at sticking around. 


This roster was poorly constructed but it is what it is and it’s hard to know how much losing those freshman hurt RT’s vision for this team. 
 

Development has been hit and miss. Hunter seems like he has regressed. Weaver is getting better and better. Mitchell has developed but not as much as I hoped. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, HookemHorns said:

Not Gerry but I think RT did well with the roster we have. The freshman both bailing really hurt the roster construction, and Shedrick/Weaver/Disu all being hurt during the offseason hurt as well. 
 

IMO we need to see how this offseason goes and how next season turns out. If he can get a good team next year between returning players/freshman signees/portal players than he may have a shot at sticking around. 


This roster was poorly constructed but it is what it is and it’s hard to know how much losing those freshman hurt RT’s vision for this team. 
 

Development has been hit and miss. Hunter seems like he has regressed. Weaver is getting better and better. Mitchell has developed but not as much as I hoped. 

More to the point, you can't turn over your roster every year in the portal. If you take a Kelvin Sampson approach you will have a better baseline.

The only HS kid that signed with Texas and has been the program more than one year is Alex Anamewke and Mitchell, that just isn't sustainable long term. compare that to Houston who has Shead, Sharp, Roberts, Francis, Arceneaux, and Walker. All key contributors though Arceneaux and Walker have been injured this season. 

Edited by Neil Leininger
  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dentonhorn said:

Coaching does matter, you hire a coach with a mediocre resume and you get what you saw on paper. 

So what would say about a coach on his 3rd team that had a 205-140 (.594) overall record, with a 2-4 tournament record was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.