Jump to content
  • LEXINGTON, Ky. — Texas won a football game on Saturday.

    That’s almost the full extent of the positives from a sobering 16-13 overtime win over a lowly Kentucky squad at Lexington’s Kroger Field.

    A team shouldn’t apologize for winning a road game in the SEC. Still, Steve Sarkisian’s offense put up a putrid performance, so much so that it nearly wasted an outstanding night on special teams and a defensive effort that, while not dominant, saw the Longhorns dig deep enough on the 86th official snap they defended to finish off a goal-line stand.

    “I always feel like, once a year, you have a culture win where the game is not pretty, but the team — because the team is so close — finds a way to win the game,” Sarkisian said. “Tonight, these guys found a way to win when the game was sliding in the wrong direction. So, absolute credit to our defense. What a tremendous goal-line stand in overtime. What a tremendous job by our special teams — Mason [Shipley], Jack [Bouwmeester], Ryan Niblett, that punt return unit — and the way they played in that phase of the game.”

    The 179 yards of total offense Texas (5-2, 2-1 SEC) posted is the lowest single-game total for the program since a 2015 season-opening loss to Notre Dame.

    Shawn Watson’s offense tallied 163 total yards in the first game of Charlie Strong’s second season, finishing a woeful night in South Bend with an average of 3.1 yards per play with only eight first downs to their credit. Tyrone Swoopes slugged his way to a 7-for-22 night, throwing the football for 93 yards.

    The Longhorns averaged 3.3 yards per play on Saturday. The offense’s anemic production matched the per-play output in a 2022 loss to TCU for the second-worst for a Sarkisian offense on the Forty Acres, trailing only the 3.2 yards per play Texas averaged in a 2021 loss to Iowa State.

    Furthermore, after a low-penalty game against Oklahoma, the offense had two critical infractions late in the game. Those errors contributed to 24 of the Longhorns’ 55 plays coming on passing downs (second-and-8 or longer and third and fourth down with a to-go distance of five or more yards) and 12 plays from scrimmage (not counting two kneel-downs by Manning) that went for no gain or lost yardage.

    “We do some things that are, obviously, very frustrating,” said Sarkisian, whose offense faced six third downs with nine or more yards needed to convert (5-for-16 on third-down attempts). “You get a hold on the first play of overtime. You get a false start in the fourth quarter when we're trying to put the game away. We catch a pass with a minute to go and we go out of bounds without getting the first down, or stay in-bounds and make them use the other timeout. There's little things that we're not doing offensively. We miss open throws. Clearly, I'm not calling enough stuff for our guys to feel good about what we're doing."

    On Saturday, Sarkisian’s offense had half as many three-and-outs (4) as first downs (8).

    Arch Manning, who has been sacked 13 times in four games against Power Four competition, had to try and make something out of nothing too often while, once again, facing an absurd amount of pressure. The Wildcats harassed Manning in 15 of his 32 dropbacks, according to Pro Football Focus, accounting for a 46.9 percent pressure rate.

    When he had time to throw, Manning’s 12-for-27 outing (132 yards) was eerily reminiscent of his performance against UTEP earlier in the season, making this game another that was marred by poor execution and numerous missed opportunities.

    “We've got to find ways to get him more completions,” Sarkisian said of Manning, who was 4-for-9 for 51 yards on third down. One of Manning’s four third-down completions was a 9-yard strike to DeAndre Moore Jr. on a third-and-7 en route to Shipley’s game-tying field goal late in the fourth quarter.

    “There’s some good things there, but there’s some layups that we’ve got to hit for him, too, and that he needs to hit,” Sarkisian said. “We need to find more of those opportunities for him.”

    After the 2015 loss to the Fighting Irish, Strong stripped Watson of play-calling duties and Swoopes was benched in favor of Jerrod Heard. Sarkisian isn’t going to demote himself and he admitted afterward that he didn’t entertain the idea of sitting Manning for a stretch and going with Matthew Caldwell.

    Still, comparing Saturday’s offensive showing against a Kentucky (2-3, 0-3) defense that came into the game allowing 192.7 rushing yards per game in SEC play side by side with a 38-3 bludgeoning at the hands of Notre Dame, a team whose two regular-season losses came to top-12 opponents on the road by a total of four points, frames the historically horrific nature of the offense's attempt to build on their efficient, productive afternoon in last Saturday’s win over Oklahoma.

    Thankfully, Texas continues to put up a united front. The defensive leaders chose to prop the offense up rather than throw the other side of the ball under the bus.

    Even when Sarkisian said the Longhorns’ identity is centered around the defense and kicking game, Colin Simmons, who had three sacks and a forced fumble in the win, felt his coach must've misspoke.

    “We're a team. We're a whole team,” Simmons said. “It ain't just defense and special teams. It's defense, special teams and offense. We've got the offense's back. The offense has got our back and the special teams got both of our backs.”

    Anthony Hill Jr., who had a game-high 12 tackles and notched his first interception of the season, said the defense understands how much it must help the offense right now. Hill indicated the defense is comfortable carrying the load, specifically because Pete Kwiatkowski’s group has the talent, experience and leadership to get the job done.

    “We know we're very young on that side,” Hill said of the offense. “We've got a lot of older guys on defense, so we want to help them out and just keep lifting them up and keep pushing them because we know their time is coming.”

    Even though the Texas offense’s ceiling is significantly lower than anyone expected, a repeat of Saturday’s performance will all but guarantee another loss, especially with the upcoming uptick in competition.

    The offense can't be expected to evolve into a juggernaut. Still, an identity in which winning the field position battle and counting on the defense to keep the opponent’s point total down is the path to victory won’t get Texas anywhere if the offense continues to drag the other two phases down.

    The defense and the punt team could’ve secured one of Kentucky's four combined fumbles. The Wildcats' 7-for-18 night on third down extended too many drives in which the Texas defense had a chance to get off the field.

    Nevertheless, the offense was so bad on Saturday that the Longhorns needed the defense to be elite and the kicking game to be virtually flawless to win. While the bar doesn’t appear to be set very high for what the offense must do to carry its weight, their ability to clear it (and by how much) will determine what becomes of the 2025 season.

    “If our style of game and our style of play is that we're going to play hard-nosed football and we're going to play great on defense and great on special teams, we need to be more efficient on offense with the opportunities that we get,” Sarkisian said. “That's what we need to do offensively, is we've got to minimize the self-inflicted wounds and become more efficient.

    “We just… We weren't efficient enough tonight.”

    • Hook 'Em 11

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    15 hours ago, Alex Butler said:

    It’s frustrating to hear stuff like we’ve got to do a better job getting him easy completions…from the play caller. Earth to Sark, call plays that do that. It’s like we’re not scouting teams on offense and attacking weaknesses it looks like we just go out and gameplan after the game has started. He fact arch hasn’t gotten hurt is still astounding to me and a testament to his toughness. It’s almost criminal to do that to him. 

    First, I am not picking on you personally.  This ultra-orange family feels your frustration.  Nor, am I giving the coaches a free ride.

    Our problem is not play selection.  NONE of them work......that's the issue.  It seems that everyone thinks it is play selection or effort. It is not.  It is play execution.  

    The basis of our problem is "paralysis through analysis".  Our linemen are thinking after the snap.  They should be doing the thinking before the snap.  By the time they figure it out, the play is blown up.   

    Then panic sets in! Receivers curl into the linebacker instead of away.  Receivers cut their routes quicker trying to "help" the QB.  Of course, that help ends up leaving the ball behind the receiver not instead of ahead. Backs have given up on "picking holes". They just run straight and hope for something.   

    If I have one issue with the coaches, the issue is that they have yet to have the linemen "just hit the closest guy".    If no one is there, go find someone to hit. Offensive linemen are not Mensa.  They are gorillas.  Treat them as such.

    Of note, the one positive big play for the night occurred (in 4th qtr) when Weisner stepped up and blocked the doggin middle linebacker. ..........  the only time any back blocked any inside threat all night.   Thank the Lord for small favors.

    One last thought:  1 ugly win = ? pretty losses

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
    1 hour ago, Inspired73 said:

    First, I am not picking on you personally.  This ultra-orange family feels your frustration.  Nor, am I giving the coaches a free ride.

    Our problem is not play selection.  NONE of them work......that's the issue.  It seems that everyone thinks it is play selection or effort. It is not.  It is play execution.  

    The basis of our problem is "paralysis through analysis".  Our linemen are thinking after the snap.  They should be doing the thinking before the snap.  By the time they figure it out, the play is blown up.   

    Then panic sets in! Receivers curl into the linebacker instead of away.  Receivers cut their routes quicker trying to "help" the QB.  Of course, that help ends up leaving the ball behind the receiver not instead of ahead. Backs have given up on "picking holes". They just run straight and hope for something.   

    If I have one issue with the coaches, the issue is that they have yet to have the linemen "just hit the closest guy".    If no one is there, go find someone to hit. Offensive linemen are not Mensa.  They are gorillas.  Treat them as such.

    Of note, the one positive big play for the night occurred (in 4th qtr) when Weisner stepped up and blocked the doggin middle linebacker. ..........  the only time any back blocked any inside threat all night.   Thank the Lord for small favors.

    One last thought:  1 ugly win = ? pretty losses

     

    I understand, and don’t feel attacked at all. I would argue that it is okay selection in addition too all the other things noted. Mainly because we’re not looking at the things other teams don’t do well, i.e. Kentucky is bottom of the SEC in rushing defense and pass defense, but we chose to try and attack their pass defense without first establishing a run game which would inflow the pass rush and create better match ups downfield. I heard a stat that we only had 6 rushes the first half. That’s not a recipe for success. Heck even if we’re going three and out running the ball at least the clock is moving and we were going three and out any way. It’s all frustrating because we have seen what we can do when we play up to our potential. Heck we focused on establishing a running game against osu and OU and they have the best defenses in the country. Why not lean on that against bad defenses? 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    21 hours ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said:

    Just when we thought that the offense had found its footing and an identity against blOwU they show how undisciplined and inconsistent they are the next game. 

    Do you think Texas had a lil fatigue played apart  from the Oklahoma game 

    Guys that was an Old school SEC dogfight in the trenches. It’s something about it’s something about Kentucky when they play at home they can be really tough. Remember that 2022 Georgia team only scored 16 points and last year vs Georgia the score was 13-12. Do y’all think there was a lil fatigue from the Oklahoma game and the fact the Kentucky came off of a BYE week played a huge part in it. 

    2 hours ago, SOUTHSWAMP said:

    Guys that was an Old school SEC dogfight in the trenches. It’s something about it’s something about Kentucky when they play at home they can be really tough. Remember that 2022 Georgia team only scored 16 points and last year vs Georgia the score was 13-12. Do y’all think there was a lil fatigue from the Oklahoma game and the fact the Kentucky came off of a BYE week played a huge part in it. 

    Good job kid bringing some positivity.

    Homecoming, at night probably gave some extra juice too.

    UF and UK both came off bye weeks.  Both a degree of desparation.

    The MSU game will be more indicative of where we stand.

    4 hours ago, Here for the Wins said:

    Good job kid bringing some positivity.

    Homecoming, at night probably gave some extra juice too.

    UF and UK both came off bye weeks.  Both a degree of desparation.

    The MSU game will be more indicative of where we stand.

    Facts 

    On 10/19/2025 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Howe said:

    I didn't write this with the intent to pour salt into the wound or beat a dead horse. I wanted to point out three things:

    1. The offensive performance against Kentucky was historically bad. To be cast in the same light as a Shawn Watson offense is as bad as it gets for a Texas play-caller.

    2. Even with the bar lowered to just asking for efficiency on offense, it didn't come close to getting cleared on Saturday. Sark even mentioned at the postgame that at some point, the dam will break if the offense keeps putting everything on the defense and kicking game.

    3. I don't think anyone is asking the offense to suddenly light it up and be elite. However, it can't put up another performance like that and expect to win. 

    I give Sark this weekend to show improve and adjustments on offense. Right now I'm leaning towards Sark giving up the play calling to focus on the entire program. Any thoughts of Milwee finishing the season and look for an OC next year?




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.