diegozanna20 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, GoHorns1 said: Post less I'm gonna start posting more 5 Quote
Atticus Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago With a name like King Large available, Kyle Flood must be pleading his case to bring him in. 1 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 2 hours ago Author Moderators Posted 2 hours ago There are some very firm prerequisites I would have for Texas in regards to portal targets this year: 1. Coming off of season-ending injury? Crossed off the list. 2. I want a seamless positional transfer. That means I am not recruiting a LT to come fill the LG spot. This is the biggest chance to maximize the window of Arch Manning. Make the most of it with sure-fire transfers, not projects or potential pieces. 15 2 Quote
cdibbs Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Think of the NIL possibilities with a name like King Large 2 Quote
Ace_Rothstein Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 12/1/2025 at 1:15 PM, TexasFanatic said: Cam Coleman is that . He would technically be redundant. Marsh is a good player and I think on Par with Wingo. Wingo doesn’t play big. Coleman has a ton of straight line speed. He’s a complete WR and a total mismatch. If he is available, you throw a bag at him. And having him and Wingo as your two main guys would be pretty deadly. 2 Quote
texcoyote15 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago We could have an Olineman named King Large and a DB named Greedy. They might as well give us the championship trophy now. 🤣🤣 1 Quote
DanielOnorato Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 12 minutes ago, cdibbs said: Think of the NIL possibilities with a name like King Large Mattress Macs King Large SuperSale 😂 1 2 Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Any ND players we want? Marcus Freemon is likely headed to Giants. Moore and the other RB from Texas? 1 Quote
901longhorn Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 12/7/2025 at 8:28 AM, TexasFanatic said: I think you would want a more experienced depth guy. Your starters will be Lefeau and Smith. Your backups will already be young (but talented) in Barnes, Atkinson, Okpola. If you add a true older depth guy I’d be extremely happy. Now if a true game wrecker comes available, you get him and worry about hurting other feelings later Any interest here?! 1 Quote
TexasDynasty3 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Any ND players we want? Marcus Freemon is likely headed to Giants. Moore and the other RB from Texas? Bring me Leonard moore. Do what needs to be done. 2 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, texcoyote15 said: We could have an Olineman named King Large and a DB named Greedy. They might as well give us the championship trophy now. 🤣🤣 Too bad we didn’t pursue Booby Feaster. 1 Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 41 minutes ago, diegozanna20 said: I'm gonna start posting more The last page of this thread, basically. 2 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 1 hour ago Author Moderators Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, 901longhorn said: Any interest here?! Just for context – Was passed up this year and played just 18 snaps after 790 in 2024. Earned a redshirt as a result of seeing just one game up this year. Had 9 PBU and 0 INT in 2024 as a starter. 1 1 Quote
Connor Vaughn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Any ND players we want? Marcus Freemon is likely headed to Giants. Moore and the other RB from Texas? That’s nothing more than a bored internet talking nonsense atp 2 Quote
Rocky P Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 40 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: There are some very firm prerequisites I would have for Texas in regards to portal targets this year: 1. Coming off of season-ending injury? Crossed off the list. 2. I want a seamless positional transfer. That means I am not recruiting a LT to come fill the LG spot. This is the biggest chance to maximize the window of Arch Manning. Make the most of it with sure-fire transfers, not projects or potential pieces. I would add they have to be a proven contributor, or at least have a decent amount of tape. I don't want players that have little to no playing time so we really don't know what they can contribute. That is for HS recruiting. 2 Quote
Beast Texas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Connor Vaughn said: That’s nothing more than a bored internet talking nonsense atp Eh I think he's on their radar but I'd put my money on Shula for that job. 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 1 hour ago Author Moderators Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Rocky P said: I would add they have to be a proven contributor, or at least have a decent amount of tape. I don't want players that have little to no playing time so we really don't know what they can contribute. That is for HS recruiting. Yes, should've included but felt like it was a given lol But absolutely correct. 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 59 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 59 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Rocky P said: Really solid football player. 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 58 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 58 minutes ago La Tech DB Michael Richard per PFF 2 Quote
Rocky P Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago 1 minute ago, CJ Vogel said: Really solid football player. I agree. The biggest problem i have with these G5 players is how much of their production is due to competition versus ability. Feel like there is more risk/reward than targeting p4 players that have tape against better competition. @CJ Vogel how do you judge that or weigh it during this process? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.