Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, General Grant said:

Please don’t change your avatar.  I’ve watched that clip like a 100 times.  Kinda have a crush on her also.

Gift me a year sub and you got a deal lol. Na next year I’m going to change it every week to the team we go against 

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said:

If we don’t go after Coleman we are not going “all in” 

So protecting Manning so he can get the ball to Coleman be damned. You need 3 top OLs and that doesn't come cheap with top schools also trying to retool their OLs as well. 

Edited by Realist Horn
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, TexasDynasty3 said:

Do you think how it’s currently constructed that the WR’s on this team are championship level? Is Mosley or Livingstone starting at Bama, OSU, Oregon, UGA, etc? I do not. 

You need more than 1 quality WR on a team.

Suggesting we dump all the receivers we have to bring in Cam Coleman is dumb and nothing can be said to convince me otherwise.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Realist Horn said:

So protecting Manning so he can get the ball to Coleman be damned. You need 3 top OLs and that doesn't come cheap with top schools are trying to retool their OLs as well. 

Coleman will be some astronomical number - we have WAY TOO many holes right now. The only way this happens is if Texas takes the “NCAA can’t hurt us” approach and blow the rev sharing out of the water + donors pony up close to $40 mil for this roster. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

You need more than 1 quality WR on a team.

Suggesting we dump all the receivers we have to bring in Cam Coleman is dumb and nothing can be said to convince me otherwise.

I was just asking. You have one reliable WR right now. That’s not gonna get it done. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said:

You get Baugh and Coleman then it doesn’t matter what else to bring in. 
 

Cut Livingstone and Mosley if you have too. Both are jags 

Wingo 

Coleman 

McCutchen 

Lockett 

Bishop 

Lets ride 

This is a joke right?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said:

You get Baugh and Coleman then it doesn’t matter what else to bring in. 
 

Cut Livingstone and Mosley if you have too. Both are jags 

Wingo 

Coleman 

McCutchen 

Lockett 

Bishop 

Lets ride 

IMG_1669.jpeg.f50c99670c7f1857e02ce86775eb1a54.jpeg

  • Haha 8
Posted
6 minutes ago, Realist Horn said:

So protecting Manning so he can get the ball to Coleman be damned. You need 3 top OLs and that doesn't come cheap with top schools also trying to retool their OLs as well. 

Make it work

Posted

Some people forget how the WR looked when Arch finally got time and stopped spiking the ball. I personally don't think we need to blow the bank on a WR. Would rather spend that at RB, LB, and OL. Everything else is less important. A Branch type WR similar to Bishop would be great, but I think that would be more of a luxury than a huge need. 

Posted

guess all you coleman lovers didnt watch the iron bowl where he coulda stepped out of bounds and stopped the clock, giving his team a chance to win. Instead he cut inside to play hero ball and fumbled, losing the game.. Not sure I'd pay $3M for that... is he a winner?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Battrayal said:

guess all you coleman lovers didnt watch the iron bowl where he coulda stepped out of bounds and stopped the clock, giving his team a chance to win. Instead he cut inside to play hero ball and fumbled, losing the game.. Not sure I'd pay $3M for that... is he a winner?

Because he’s exponentially better than any Wide receiver Texas has this year or last year. 
 

 

Posted

I guess the upside to letting aggy blow $4 million on Cam Coleman is that they have limited NIL to allocate elsewhere. And if Reed is their QB again next year, it might not matter who’s at WR. It’s not like their very expensive WR room did anything to us this year. Coleman is a lot of wasted money if they can’t even get him the ball. As long as Marcel Reed is there, their offense isn’t exactly the stuff of nightmares.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Bunk Moreland said:

I guess the upside to letting aggy blow $4 million on Cam Coleman is that they have limited NIL to allocate elsewhere. And if Reed is their QB again next year, it might not matter who’s at WR. It’s not like their very expensive WR room did anything to us this year. Coleman is a lot of wasted money if they can’t even get him the ball. As long as Marcel Reed is there, their offense isn’t exactly the stuff of nightmares.

Coleman isn’t going for 4 M

Posted
11 minutes ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

You need more than 1 quality WR on a team.

Suggesting we dump all the receivers we have to bring in Cam Coleman is dumb and nothing can be said to convince me otherwise.

Nobody is saying you dump all of them. You wouldn’t need to do that either if you’re getting Coleman.

Posted
Just now, FaxMachine said:

Because he’s exponentially better than any Wide receiver Texas has this year or last year. 
 

 

It’s kinda hard for WRs to make an impact when arch has only like 2 seconds to get the ball off in time cause our oline was beat against so poorly. Coleman would be awesome but if we don’t address the OL issue we will be right back in the same spot as this year.

Posted
1 minute ago, TexasFanatic said:

Coleman isn’t going for 4 M

Thats how much jeremiah makes, without being a free agent. wouldnt be surprised if he got close to that

Posted
Just now, Shmatt said:

It’s kinda hard for WRs to make an impact when arch has only like 2 seconds to get the ball off in time cause our oline was beat against so poorly. Coleman would be awesome but if we don’t address the OL issue we will be right back in the same spot as this year.

You do both in an “all in” season. Unless we are taking Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys approach to all in. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said:

If y’all think Mosley and Livingstone are natty level WRs, I don’t know what to tell you 

They were literally the most reliable ball catchers on the team. We desperately need RBs, LBs and IOL before we even sniff a WR.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.