CHorn427 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago vs ND or Miami Is this a possibility? Screw the Citrus vs Michigan 1 Quote
Alex Butler Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Doubtful, these bowls have contracts with conferences so they know the no. X team from SEC plays the no. X team from big 10 etc. The bowls very seldom get to select the teams especially big schools. Quote
John F. Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Possible but doubtful. The Gator Bowl is affiliated with the SEC, but the Citrus Bowl has the first pick of non playoff SEC teams. Texas is a draw so hard to imagine them passing. 1 Quote
CHorn427 Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, John F. said: Possible but doubtful. The Gator Bowl is affiliated with the SEC, but the Citrus Bowl has the first pick of non playoff SEC teams. Texas is a draw so hard to imagine them passing. Where is the order? Quote
CHorn427 Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago I hate that we’re gonna play Michigan. Really do. Nothing to gain. Winless vs ranked teams. It will just be a win margin comparison game at best Quote
4thandFive Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I’ll take anybody…so far as 95% of our team plays. Quote
AndyL Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The players that would definitely not play- Anthony Hill, Malik Muhammad, maybe Ethan Burke? Quote
ArizonaLonghorn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, whereiend said: We are in the Citrus Bowl vs Michigan As Steve Spurrier would put it "You can't spell Citrus without U-T" Quote
Cajunhorn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 15 minutes ago, AndyL said: The players that would definitely not play- Anthony Hill, Malik Muhammad, maybe Ethan Burke? I bet Burke plays. The more positive game tape he puts out the better. Quote
horns96 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 34 minutes ago, CHorn427 said: I hate that we’re gonna play Michigan. Really do. Nothing to gain. Winless vs ranked teams. It will just be a win margin comparison game at best According to statistical models, Texas would only be favored by 3 pts vs. Michigan on a neutral field. Quote
whereiend Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, horns96 said: According to statistical models, Texas would only be favored by 3 pts vs. Michigan on a neutral field. Sark really sandbagged the statistical models by spending 10 games stubbornly trying to be a power running play action team with Connor Stroh and Nick Brooks at guard and CJ Baxter at RB 😭 Quote
horns96 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, whereiend said: Sark really sandbagged the statistical models by spending 10 games stubbornly trying to be a power running play action team with Connor Stroh and Nick Brooks at guard and CJ Baxter at RB 😭 Seems like you have some keen insight, throw it all on Texas -3. 💰💰💰💰💰 Quote
CHorn427 Posted 49 minutes ago Author Posted 49 minutes ago 25 minutes ago, horns96 said: According to statistical models, Texas would only be favored by 3 pts vs. Michigan on a neutral field. Michigan hasn’t come within 11 pts of any ranked team they’ve played. I’d put my life on Texas -3. Quote
CHorn427 Posted 48 minutes ago Author Posted 48 minutes ago 26 minutes ago, horns96 said: According to statistical models, Texas would only be favored by 3 pts vs. Michigan on a neutral field. The problem isn’t winning the game. The problem is Texas gets no credit if we win and won’t move up rankings or anything. We would if we played and beat ND or Miami Quote
horns96 Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, CHorn427 said: The problem isn’t winning the game. The problem is Texas gets no credit if we win and won’t move up rankings or anything. We would if we played and beat ND or Miami we missed the playoff, who cares about the end of season rankings? A win over Michigan is a win over Michigan. Edited 45 minutes ago by horns96 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.