whereiend Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) It's a legit take that our defense was already pretty good, and making this change has risk to it. I personally think the analytics over rate PK a little. His style of play ("make them drive the entire field") is good for the defensive efficiency stats, but has two key flaws: 1.) It hurts our offense that they have to sit on the sidelines so much while the opponent dinks and dunks for easy first downs, 2.) the entire concept relies on college offenses not being able to put together complete drives. But what happens when we play elite teams and they actually can complete drives? I do long for a defense that makes the opponent fight for every first down, and I think that is the hope with Muschamp. Edited 1 hour ago by whereiend Quote
VaHorn Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago In fairness, Adam has bad takes on most subjects. Quote
SarkNotSteven Posted 6 minutes ago Posted 6 minutes ago I like Adam, but disagree with him on Muschamp/PK… Adam’s eruption over CJ’s tweet on the halftime mariachi thing was priceless 🤣 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.