whereiend Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago (edited) It's a legit take that our defense was already pretty good, and making this change has risk to it. I personally think the analytics over rate PK a little. His style of play ("make them drive the entire field") is good for the defensive efficiency stats, but has two key flaws: 1.) It hurts our offense that they have to sit on the sidelines so much while the opponent dinks and dunks for easy first downs, 2.) the entire concept relies on college offenses not being able to put together complete drives. But what happens when we play elite teams and they actually can complete drives? I do long for a defense that makes the opponent fight for every first down, and I think that is the hope with Muschamp. Edited 10 hours ago by whereiend 2 Quote
VaHorn Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago In fairness, Adam has bad takes on most subjects. 2 3 Quote
SarkNotSteven Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago I like Adam, but disagree with him on Muschamp/PK… Adam’s eruption over CJ’s tweet on the halftime mariachi thing was priceless 🤣 1 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Adam is a moron. He also has said Petrino is better than Sark. He probably should stick to his lady bird lake serial killer conspiracies. 3 Quote
General Grant Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 7 hours ago, drag worm said: He has some awful takes on sports. I’ll leave it at that to be nice. Quote
HookedOnTF Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I don't get the need for a sponsor to try a case in public against the team he roots for. 2 Quote
Longmire Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 8 hours ago, drag worm said: Hope he sponsors a large amount. Quote
Neil Leininger Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 hours ago, Bobby Burton said: Adam's welcome to his opinion. Just like we all are. Yes, but that opionion is stupid. 1 Quote
tmataya Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 9 hours ago, drag worm said: Looks like he will file an injunction to block this appointment. Quote
Jc Dobbs Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 5 hours ago, Orangeblooded said: Bend but dont break D's suck. It allows your opponent to flip the field on you. Rather an attacking D any day. The one time the Texas Defense frustrated me to the max was when the Horns kicked what should have been the winning FG vs OU... and bent so much with very little time left that the Longhorns lost. Hook 'Em! Quote
SueVide Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago This is a football matter not a personal injury lawsuit. I think I'll trust Coach Sark on this one. Quote
All Gas No Brakes Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 10 hours ago, drag worm said: The Texas Hammer is it 😂 1 Quote
SueVide Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 42 minutes ago, All Gas No Brakes said: The Texas Hammer is it 😂 Funny. I've met the Lil' Hammer taking over. Quote
HookEmBrad Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 hours ago, ClubWhatever said: Has he been injured in a car wreck? Yeah, he must've bumped his head. Quote
Waxahorn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago It's clear to me that the 2026 schedule demands a more aggressive style defense that flips the field in our favor. Bend but don't break gives me heartburn and gas. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.