Realist Horn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, Jimmy Two Times said: Very convincing "money is NOT a huge factor for me" list of schools, Princwill. Also teams that have won a lot lately, sans a&m Quote
NothinButDaHorns34 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, Coop2395 said: I’m gonna say it… I would rather have the miss st guard and prince will over seaton. Seaton is a luxury to me. Princewill is a top 5 returning sack artist in the SEC. Think about putting that dude opposite of colin on 3rd and long. Edited 1 hour ago by NothinButDaHorns34 2 1 Quote
davisxcole Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 40 minutes ago, akhookem said: As of now yes. But like I said, do any of us think he is anything above serviceable? I personally don’t, not a shot on him but if you solidify both guard spots and someone happens to go into the portal I’m curious what Texas does🤷🏼♂️ Nah he’s good Quote
GoHorns1 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 50 minutes ago, OTFBrandon said: the portal closes tomorrow no point of having money left over for the 26 season Players don’t have to make decisions just the portal closes 1 Quote
Chris Simons Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, Realist Horn said: Right, add/drop is Tuesday. He’ll have to decide this weekend in all likelihood Can't the dean admit them even after that date? 1 Quote
davisxcole Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said: Seaton is a luxury to me. Princewill is a top 5 returning sack artist in the SEC. Top 2 2 Quote
Flynn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, Coop2395 said: I’m gonna say it… I would rather have the miss st guard and prince will over seaton. Why not all of them? 2 Quote
davisxcole Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, Realist Horn said: Right, add/drop is Tuesday. He’ll have to decide this weekend in all likelihood You don’t have to be a mid term addition, even though almost all will Quote
NothinButDaHorns34 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, davisxcole said: Top 2 Didn’t realize colin is the only one returning ahead of him. Edited 1 hour ago by NothinButDaHorns34 2 Quote
TexasOnTop Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 42 minutes ago, OTFBrandon said: Idk if anyone bigger than Seaton rn in the portal. He’s the big fish we need to hook. I honestly don’t think anyone is a higher priority than him right now and if surprisingly someone like a Leonard Moore from ND or a Jeremiah Smith were to jump in last minute for no reason then i see no reason not to spend it on Seaton as of now. I was all for Seaton prior to the Wake Forest tackle signing. If we get him I won’t complain, but I also want Muschamp to be able to run his full scheme without limitations on personnel. We’ve added a ton on offense and we’ve missed a bit on defense imo. A starting guard and depth on offense and then fill out the defense with Muschaps needs imo. 3 Quote
davisxcole Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, NothinButDaHorns34 said: Didn’t realize colin is the only one returning ahead of him. Dylan Stewart is back too but Prince finished 2nd in sacks in the sec I believe 1 Quote
NothinButDaHorns34 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, davisxcole said: Dylan Stewart is back too but Prince finished 2nd in sacks in the sec I believe Nightmare fuel to have the top two returning leaders of sacks in the SEC coming off both edges. 4 Quote
Bevohorns Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, Coop2395 said: I’m gonna say it… I would rather have the miss st guard and prince will over seaton. The miss st guard pff scores are bad Quote
Neil Leininger Posted 59 minutes ago Posted 59 minutes ago 49 minutes ago, akhookem said: As of now yes. But like I said, do any of us think he is anything above serviceable? I personally don’t, not a shot on him but if you solidify both guard spots and someone happens to go into the portal I’m curious what Texas does🤷🏼♂️ The whole OL got demonstratively better when he took over. 1 1 Quote
LakeHighlandsHorn Posted 59 minutes ago Posted 59 minutes ago 24 minutes ago, Realist Horn said: This guy would have to make a decision pretty quickly. If he wants to win- come to Texas. This is a joke post FYI Quote
akhookem Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Neil Leininger said: The whole OL got demonstratively better when he took over. Better yes, but not good unfortunately lol Quote
cochamps Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, akhookem said: Better yes, but not good unfortunately lol Pretty good at protecting Arch, but about average run blocking, imo. Quote
Aspann85 Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago 1 hour ago, akhookem said: As of now yes. But like I said, do any of us think he is anything above serviceable? I personally don’t, not a shot on him but if you solidify both guard spots and someone happens to go into the portal I’m curious what Texas does🤷🏼♂️ Well, seeing as how the line was vastly improved when he was put into the lineup, like Night and Day different, I’m sure he is better than “serviceable.” But, what do I know? I’m not an oline scout/coach/aficionado like you… Quote
Coop2395 Posted 41 minutes ago Posted 41 minutes ago 18 minutes ago, Bevohorns said: The miss st guard pff scores are bad Have you seen seatons? Quote
Aspann85 Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago (edited) 27 minutes ago, Chris Simons said: Can't the dean admit them even after that date? Yes. With sign offs from the professors. Been there/done that. Edited 39 minutes ago by Aspann85 1 Quote
Aspann85 Posted 37 minutes ago Posted 37 minutes ago 24 minutes ago, TexasOnTop said: I was all for Seaton prior to the Wake Forest tackle signing. If we get him I won’t complain, but I also want Muschamp to be able to run his full scheme without limitations on personnel. We’ve added a ton on offense and we’ve missed a bit on defense imo. A starting guard and depth on offense and then fill out the defense with Muschaps needs imo. When did we all of a sudden run out of money and this became an either/or thing? Pretty sure the way this staff and boosters are going, they will come up with the asking for whoever they deem a fit. Quote
OTFBrandon Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago 23 minutes ago, TexasOnTop said: I was all for Seaton prior to the Wake Forest tackle signing. If we get him I won’t complain, but I also want Muschamp to be able to run his full scheme without limitations on personnel. We’ve added a ton on offense and we’ve missed a bit on defense imo. A starting guard and depth on offense and then fill out the defense with Muschaps needs imo. That makes sense, i just don’t get the point of getting the WF tackle if they’re not planning on bringing in more guys aggressively. To me it’s like if Texas settled on another reciver other than Coleman. I understand the money side of things and the team needs extend more than the oline but i feel like for weeks everyone was complaining about the line and now are settled with what we got. I’m not saying i’m not impressed or upset with what Texas has brought in, but it’s like the scenario of getting two good receivers instead of coleman imo. Again though I haven’t been unimpressed a day this whole cycle so maybe i’m tripping and hung up on the big fish lol. 1 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 24 minutes ago Author Moderators Posted 24 minutes ago Good to see @Joe Zuragetting an NIL deal Congrats!!! 4 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.