All Gas No Brakes Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago If the NCAA says it’s happening, it’ll be happening. But in about 5 to 7 years. 1 3 Quote
GetHooked Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Joe Zura said: I have to think that NOT retroactive will create a lawsuit or two. Quote
Beldar Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 38 minutes ago, Joe Zura said: Hope so. Needs to happen. 1 Quote
Moderators Hank South Posted 21 hours ago Moderators Posted 21 hours ago 20 minutes ago, GetHooked said: I have to think that NOT retroactive will create a lawsuit or two. Agree 2 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 21 hours ago Moderators Posted 21 hours ago Absolutely it is expected to happen Was told late last week that it’s expected … and that 4th year seniors in this class will not be granted an extra year. I was also told the Texas A&M G-League commit Bryson Warren is not expected to be eligible- but we shall wait on official word. He’s five years removed from HS graduating class already. 4 3 Quote
Joe Zura Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago So if this actually happens the amount of lawsuits the NCAA is going to get hit with is going to be wild right? 1 Quote
HelloThere Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 1 minute ago, Joe Zura said: So if this actually happens the amount of lawsuits the NCAA is going to get hit with is going to be wild right? They are going to get sued no matter what so they need to pass it anyway. If it gets the 28 year old "freshmen" out of college sports then I am all for it. 4 Quote
HonkEm Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Joe Zura said: So if this actually happens the amount of lawsuits the NCAA is going to get hit with is going to be wild right? The part that jumps out to me is Baker saying the age‑based eligibility rule won’t be retroactive. That’s exactly the kind of thing that’s going to trigger lawsuits. You can’t create a new eligibility pathway for future players while telling the guys who already exhausted their years, “Sorry, tough luck.” That’s two different classes of athletes overnight. And with NIL in the mix now, players can argue real financial harm from being denied another year. That’s a very different legal landscape than the NCAA is used to. They’ve been getting hammered in court for years, and this is another situation where their logic is going to get tested hard. So yeah - if this rule goes through as “not retroactive,” the amount of legal action coming their way is going to be wild. The NCAA keeps trying to modernize without fully thinking through the consequences, and every time they do that, the courts end up cleaning up the mess. Quote
Michelle Lynn Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 25 minutes ago, HelloThere said: They are going to get sued no matter what so they need to pass it anyway. If it gets the 28 year old "freshmen" out of college sports then I am all for it. This would impact Seymore I think… edit: maybe not?? Idk these rules are confusing! 😅 Edited 21 hours ago by Michelle Lynn Quote
HonkEm Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, Michelle Lynn said: This would impact Seymore I think… I wouldn't think so based on everything Baker said today, this age‑based eligibility rule wouldn’t affect Seymour at all. The “not retroactive” part only applies to older players who already burned through their eligibility and were hoping to come back under the new system. Seymour isn’t in that category - he still has eligibility left and he’s well under the age threshold the NCAA is targeting. So I would think nothing changes for him coming to Texas this summer. His spot, his timeline, and his eligibility are all the same. The only people who get squeezed by this are the older guys who were hoping for one more year, not incoming transfers like Seymour. Want to thank Joe for posting this....so interesting. Edited 21 hours ago by HonkEm 4 Quote
HalfmileHorn Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Sorry, I thought the thread was "5 on 5" ... 1 Quote
LonghornFan4Ever Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 10 minutes ago, HalfmileHorn said: Sorry, I thought the thread was "5 on 5" ... How does “5 on 5” in Detroit sound 11 months from now? 1 Quote
PaulieD Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 16 hours ago, Joe Zura said: So if this actually happens the amount of lawsuits the NCAA is going to get hit with is going to be wild right? 1 Quote
horn1 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago If implemented this coming season, 4th year true seniors will absolutely sue...as they should. This affects true 4th year seniors like Jordan Pope. He'll be in line for a nice NIL payday! Quote
Layton_Sharp Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago 19 hours ago, HalfmileHorn said: Sorry, I thought the thread was "5 on 5" ... @Joe Zura starting a basketball thread? Absolutely not Quote
Joe Zura Posted 36 minutes ago Author Posted 36 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Layton_Sharp said: @Joe Zura starting a basketball thread? Absolutely not I would rather say nice things about Kyle flood than start a mid ball thread 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.