Jordan91 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 11 minutes ago, BobInHouston said: If someone has won in court against an organization, and the organization subsequently threatens someone that can provide a remedy, a judge is not likely to tell that someone, "Sorry, can't do anything about that." That judge would want that decision enforced. I agree, but what else is there to do? Quote
Little Carmine Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 8/2/2026 at 4:27 AM, harveycmd said: Not sure what's "better" in this context. I'm thinking historical importance. I saw the post with the city limit sign for Detroit, TX. I remember playing Detroit in a tournament in Sulphur Springs in December 1988. Their fans had a chant that went something like, "De-Troit, De-Troit. We're coming at you now and we're gonna rule the court, De-Troit, De-Troit." We won the game something like 77-61. Harvey doing work reminding people that the "Ignore" function is available; very possible he ends up in a conversation with himself arguing about if Kobe is a better player than Kobe 1 Quote
BobInHouston Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Jordan91 said: I agree, but what else is there to do? How about everyone cool down and let the seniors play? The NCAA already poisoned the well by saying that fourth-year seniors weren't covered. And the judge said other rules weren't affected, so if you aren't already in the portal, too bad. I do not see what the big deal is. Every other class can play, and nobody promised them 5-for-5 when *they* signed. Much ado about nothing. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.