Ok AG responds to TX AG

[stephanie]

Edited 18 hours ago by stephanie
Adding link

[Jerky]

Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat.  Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. 

Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 

[Alex Butler]

The only time in history I’m rooting for Oklahoma over Texas in anything…

[VaHorn]

Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. 

[Bobbers]

3 hours ago, VaHorn said:

Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. 

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

[Randy Fistfighter]

11 minutes ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

How are Tech's opponents indirectly affected? If Sayin gambled on games like Sorsby and was allowed to play, I'm pretty sure that directly affects Texas. Or is gambling ok?

[harveycmd]

2 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing.

[Jarveaux]

13 hours ago, Jerky said:

Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat.  Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. 

Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 

Hopefully other AG’s will follow suit through out Big 12

[VaHorn]

10 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

I’m talking about the legal analysis in the letters. We know it’s a political letter and we know why Paxton wrote it. But he didn’t have to write gibberish.