Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat.  Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. 

Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 hours ago, VaHorn said:

Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. 

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

Posted
11 minutes ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

How are Tech's opponents indirectly affected? If Sayin gambled on games like Sorsby and was allowed to play, I'm pretty sure that directly affects Texas. Or is gambling ok?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
13 hours ago, Jerky said:

Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat.  Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. 

Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 

Hopefully other AG’s will follow suit through out Big 12

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

I’m talking about the legal analysis in the letters. We know it’s a political letter and we know why Paxton wrote it. But he didn’t have to write gibberish.

  • Confused 1
Posted
11 hours ago, harveycmd said:

Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing.

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bobbers said:

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused.

Posted
29 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused.

You are wrong and that’s OK. The AG’s job is to represent the state in legal matters.   Texas Tech is being pressured by the Big 12 to ignore a judge’s ruling. 

You try ignoring a judge’s ruling in your life and report back here.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.