stephanie Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago (edited) Edited 22 hours ago by stephanie Adding link 3 1 Quote
Jerky Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat. Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 2 Quote
Alex Butler Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago The only time in history I’m rooting for Oklahoma over Texas in anything… 7 Quote
VaHorn Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. 3 1 Quote
Bobbers Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 3 hours ago, VaHorn said: Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. That is absolutely untrue. Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal. Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected. Quote
Randy Fistfighter Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 11 minutes ago, Bobbers said: That is absolutely untrue. Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal. Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected. How are Tech's opponents indirectly affected? If Sayin gambled on games like Sorsby and was allowed to play, I'm pretty sure that directly affects Texas. Or is gambling ok? 1 Quote
harveycmd Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 2 hours ago, Bobbers said: That is absolutely untrue. Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal. Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected. Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing. 4 Quote
Jarveaux Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 13 hours ago, Jerky said: Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat. Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. Hopefully other AG’s will follow suit through out Big 12 2 Quote
VaHorn Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 10 hours ago, Bobbers said: That is absolutely untrue. Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal. Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected. I’m talking about the legal analysis in the letters. We know it’s a political letter and we know why Paxton wrote it. But he didn’t have to write gibberish. 1 Quote
Bobbers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, harveycmd said: Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing. omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General. He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12. The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order. This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider. This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge. Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious. Quote
harveycmd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Bobbers said: omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General. He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12. The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order. This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider. This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge. Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious. No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused. Quote
Bobbers Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 29 minutes ago, harveycmd said: No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused. You are wrong and that’s OK. The AG’s job is to represent the state in legal matters. Texas Tech is being pressured by the Big 12 to ignore a judge’s ruling. You try ignoring a judge’s ruling in your life and report back here. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.