Ok AG responds to TX AG

[stephanie]

Edited Friday at 09:02 PM by stephanie
Adding link

[Jerky]

Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat.  Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. 

Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 

[Alex Butler]

The only time in history I’m rooting for Oklahoma over Texas in anything…

[VaHorn]

Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. 

[Bobbers]

3 hours ago, VaHorn said:

Based solely on the two letters, Oklahoma is doing much better on the legal analysis sort of thing. 

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

[Randy Fistfighter]

11 minutes ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

How are Tech's opponents indirectly affected? If Sayin gambled on games like Sorsby and was allowed to play, I'm pretty sure that directly affects Texas. Or is gambling ok?

[harveycmd]

2 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing.

[Jarveaux]

13 hours ago, Jerky said:

Good move to get the OK AG to weigh in and counter the TX AG threat.  Now Yormark/B12 has no excuse not to act. 

Expect to see B12 take action this month vs TT. 

Hopefully other AG’s will follow suit through out Big 12

[VaHorn]

10 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

I’m talking about the legal analysis in the letters. We know it’s a political letter and we know why Paxton wrote it. But he didn’t have to write gibberish.

[Bobbers]

11 hours ago, harveycmd said:

Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing.

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

[harveycmd]

2 minutes ago, Bobbers said:

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused.

[Bobbers]

29 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused.

You are wrong and that’s OK. The AG’s job is to represent the state in legal matters.   Texas Tech is being pressured by the Big 12 to ignore a judge’s ruling. 

You try ignoring a judge’s ruling in your life and report back here.

 

[THookem]

 

[Dread-headed Texan]

1 hour ago, THookem said:

 

😂 If you're gonna do it then do it big. Saying I was money laundering and running my own gambling ring sounds a whole lot better on the yard when they ask what you in for and your reply is I bet five dollars on myself on the under

[harveycmd]

4 hours ago, Bobbers said:

You are wrong and that’s OK. The AG’s job is to represent the state in legal matters.   Texas Tech is being pressured by the Big 12 to ignore a judge’s ruling. 

You try ignoring a judge’s ruling in your life and report back here.

 

It's not a ruling but rather an injunction granted pending litigation that results in a ruling.

Try citing the description in the Texas Constitution that verifies your contention that the Attorney General is required in all circumstances to defend state entities regardless of context and other state court activities, which may include other state injunctions. It seems to me you might well be an unwitting legal positivist in the tradition of Hans Kelsen. 

[tsip92]

4 hours ago, Bobbers said:

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

The AG’s job is to enforce the laws of the state of Texas, which Sorsby has violated and the AG appears to have done nothing about.

[Burnt Orange Horn]

18 hours ago, Bobbers said:

That is absolutely untrue.  Paxton is doing his job by advocating for a state entity that is directly affected by this scandal.  Drummond is advocating for a state entity that is indirectly affected.  

So you are moving to Lubbock soon?

 🤘🏻🤘🏼🤘🤘🏽🤘🏾🤘🏿

[Burnt Orange Horn]

5 hours ago, Bobbers said:

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

Why again does TTU need a legal defense by the Texas AG???   🤷🏾

[harveycmd]

3 minutes ago, Burnt Orange Horn said:

Why again does TTU need a legal defense by the Texas AG???   🤷🏾

I think Bobbers is giving us the Cliff Clavin analysis of Texas AG duties. 

[Bobbers]

On 6/13/2026 at 5:54 PM, harveycmd said:

I think Bobbers is giving us the Cliff Clavin analysis of Texas AG duties. 

So, you decided not to address one point that I made and insult me instead. You come off of somebody who’s not very bright.

[whereiend]

On 6/13/2026 at 12:46 PM, Bobbers said:

omg....that is literally the job description of the State Attorney General.  He is defending Texas Tech, a state entity that is abiding by a court order, against the Big 12.  

The Big 12 is demanding that a state university violate a court order.

This has nothing to do with being a Democrat or a Republican or a Longhorn or Red Raider.  This has everything to do with the (in my view) terrible ruling by the judge.  Paxton is simply doing his job, but apparently most here are too biased to see the obvious.

C'mon man we are talking about Ken Paxton. Obviously Campbell wrote him a check here. It's not difficult to read between the lines.

[AusMOJO]

On 6/14/2026 at 4:38 AM, THookem said:

 

Isn't some of the stuff he's done considered point shaving? Unless I'm just stupid and it's not lol.