Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They almost had it until the protect college sports act. They should’ve ended with: “the SEC will not allow its member schools to have players who signed a professional contract to play in college games. Any school that chooses to do so will risk forfeit of all wins in which such players dressed out.”

  • Hook 'Em 7
Posted
Just now, Dawson Yarbrough said:

Even with the TROs and injunctions, can’t the NCAA just simply say if you play with a player that signed a pro contract, we can’t stop you, but you will be forced to vacate that win/s? 

Sure, but what would a court say? 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Moderators
Posted
2 minutes ago, Dawson Yarbrough said:

Even with the TROs and injunctions, can’t the NCAA just simply say if you play with a player that signed a pro contract, we can’t stop you, but you will be forced to vacate that win/s? 

I guess. It's all such a mess.

Posted
1 minute ago, Jordan91 said:

Sure, but what would a court say? 

They would say this isn’t a midball thread and your voice doesn’t matter 🤣🤣 just kidding boss 😂 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Alex Butler said:

They almost had it until the protect college sports act.

Fully agree with you! That was my first thought, too. They should have left that last sentence out of the statement.

 I also wouldn’t object to your proposed version of an ending.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Apparently AD's and Chancellor's have been called to Birmingham tomorrow (or this week) for a meeting among all SEC schools. 

So they do have balls and are not going to let this crap fly 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Apparently AD's and Chancellor's have been called to Birmingham tomorrow (or this week) for a meeting among all SEC schools. 

This is giving me Monster Energy Big 12 TM vibes. When they all met to talk about problem child  Tech. In this case the problem child LSU. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, genevalonghorn said:

The SEC is not going to take a hard line against a key member institution. 

They should, it might send a message to all members, but I agree with you that they won’t take a hard line stance.

That’s why it is a worthless statement, imo.

It will be interesting to see what comes out of the meeting ADs and Chancellors.

Posted

Was listening to Andy Staples today and he had a good point - this rule was adopted to prevent Spring transfers when the Spring portal existed.  

So there's enough ambiguity that maybe Sankey doesn't want to go to bat?

What an absolute mess.  We need college football to get on the field to save them from themselves, because I can't take another week of this insanity.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.