Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Shmatt said:

Putting behind two terrible OLs in a row and not expecting him to get rattled in any way shape or form. Furthermore I don’t have to answer any of your questions if I don’t want to

Funny how our line and running game looked so much better when Arch was hitting open receivers and defenses stopped loading the box. See the fourth quarter of Oh St for more detail. 
 

And, no, you don’t have to answer. But you did make the statement. Tragic you can’t make any sense on it. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Shmatt said:

Hate to break it to ya but football is a what have you done for me now sport rather than what you did for me in the past

Even then, the problems that currently we currently have with teams this year and last still existed. It's why we lost both semi finals. 

Posted
Just now, Oldest Horn said:

Funny how our line and running game looked so much better when Arch was hitting open receivers and defenses stopped loading the box. See the fourth quarter of Oh St for more detail. 
 

And, no, you don’t have to answer. But you did make the statement. Tragic you can’t make any sense on it. 

Tragic when you can’t tell you’re in a losing battle with almost everyone else on this board🤘

Posted
3 minutes ago, Shmatt said:

Hate to break it to ya but football is a what have you done for me now sport rather than what you did for me in the past

No kidding. See Arch’s performance over the last two weeks. As you said, he’s broken. 

Posted
Just now, Rockin TL said:

Even then, the problems that currently we currently have with teams this year and last still existed. It's why we lost both semi finals. 

Yup they have always been there, Sark was just saved by talent 

Posted
Just now, Shmatt said:

Tragic when you can’t tell you’re in a losing battle with almost everyone else on this board🤘

Funny you call Arch broken but I’m losing. 
 

Would Arch say he’s broken?

Posted
Just now, Oldest Horn said:

No kidding. See Arch’s performance over the last two weeks. As you said, he’s broken. 

No kidding look at the teams Sark has put out on the field the past two years. And has has gotten out coached in the biggest of moments 

Posted
1 minute ago, Oldest Horn said:

Funny you call Arch broken but I’m losing. 
 

Would Arch say he’s broken?

and what if KJ Lacey goes out there and looks as bad as Arch? I’m just saying it starts at the top man. Arch is definitely broken but so is Sark, Kyle flood and AJ

Posted
Just now, Shmatt said:

No kidding look at the teams Sark has put out on the field the past two years. And has has gotten out coached in the biggest of moments 

Trusting Arch could well be Sark’s downfall. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Shmatt said:

and what if KJ Lacey goes out there and looks as bad as Arch? I’m just saying it starts at the top man. Arch is definitely broken but so is Sark, Kyle flood and AJ

As DKR told James Street when putting him in for Super Bill Bradley, “Aw hell, you can’t do any worse!” 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Oldest Horn said:

It’s looking like less and less of a coincidence that our running game found life after Arch started hitting passes against Oh St. And it happened in that order, not the other way around. 

That actually makes a lot of sense - it's the reverse of 'the run sets up the pass' theory.  When the opposing D knows that the short pass scenario is non existent they can concentrate on the run.

Posted
1 hour ago, MCTEX said:

If this is a run, then both the right guard and the right tackle blew their assignment. They both should be blocking down on the player in their inside gap. 
 

Probably a bad play call as well, too many orange helmets to block and not enough white helmets.  

On this pic, if RG, RT, TE block down to the left and Terry gets the guy TE is blocking we have hat on hat. We only needed 2 yards. Again, who makes the blocking calls? That guy needs help or replaced. Y can’t we get “Omaha, Omaha” and everyone point to their guy. 

Posted
Just now, PaulieD said:

That actually makes a lot of sense - it's the reverse of 'the run sets up the pass' theory.  When the opposing D knows that the short pass scenario is non existent they can concentrate on the run.

It’s the complement to the run sets up the pass. If defenses know you can’t handle pressure or see open receivers, they with send six often. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
Just now, Oldest Horn said:

It’s the complement to the run sets up the pass. If defenses know you can’t handle pressure or see open receivers, they with send six often. 

OK

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)

It is a very complicated offense that needs consistent elite execution for it to work. This is just stupid in today's college game, he needs to stop trying to get a NFL job and win college football games. He could dial up plays to make it easier to get Arch into some sort of rhythm, and if Arch still can't make it happen, then it's not going to happen for Arch. Consider how easy the Florida OC made the reads for Jones this past Saturday. Jones needed to make 2 throws all game.

Edited by Neil Leininger
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Brho said:

When you don’t have a qb that can see the field or make the throws it’s going to make the offense look bad. 

When there is no threat of a running game and teams can pin their ears back in the pass rush and you never call a HB slip screen it's on the coaches. Sark picked his groceries and their running game is abysmal to help the pass. 

Posted
1 minute ago, DanielOnorato said:

When there is no threat of a running game and teams can pin their ears back in the pass rush and you never call a HB slip screen it's on the coaches. Sark picked his groceries and their running game is abysmal to help the pass. 

When there’s no threat of the pass the d can load the box and send six at will. Works both ways. 

Posted
5 hours ago, pinkman_90 said:

I can keep these coming but I’ll start with the one that lost us the game.  

I don't get why we just don't go empty spread formation in these situations and just run our 6'4 220 pound QB to pick up the first down. 

Posted
2 hours ago, MCTEX said:

If this is a run, then both the right guard and the right tackle blew their assignment. They both should be blocking down on the player in their inside gap. 
 

Probably a bad play call as well, too many orange helmets to block and not enough white helmets.  

They explained in the video that the only way this play would work in this set up is if Shannon is lined up on the left side instead. But either way, a truly developed QB would've noticed the mismatch and either called an audible or timeout. Sark is at fault for a couple of the short distance playcalls that went wayward on money downs. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.