Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Three out on a limb thoughts:
1) Is our DL too good for our OL's development? Even the DL twos are good enough that I wonder if they've broken the OL's confidence. Instead of developing, are the linemen spending every practice correcting mistakes? Iron sharpens aluminum?
2) Is the OL coach really the answer? Every time we've hired a "top 5 OL coach" since 2010, the result has been the same. Bill Bedenbaugh didn't forget how to coach either, and Oklahoma's line is struggling too. A big name college coach has to align with Sark, and an NFL OL coach might help with scheme and technique, but maybe not with developing 18-year-olds. So is it really as simple as firing Flood and throwing money at the next home-run hire with skins on the wall?
3) Is it strength? Becton has the team fast and well conditioned. The DL anchors well but doesn't really penetrate (bonus pts for big man tuddys), and the OL looks weak. A few years ago I think we brought Dana LeDuc back to work on strength. Is he still around? Is strength training part of the OL's struggle, or do they just not know what to do in live fire? 

Posted

We all know it but that doesn’t make it easier to look at on a spreadsheet. This needs to be papered all over the locker rooms, practice field, weight room, etc as a challenge to the OLine. It’s just simple pride that should be taking a hit…I couldn’t look at my teammates if this was me. I quit my sport because my heart wasn’t in it anymore and I wasn’t helping the team.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, HookedOnTF said:

Yes Sark and Arch could do their part to discourage DCs from a full frontal assault, but this sure is crazy to see:

ol-envy-2026.thumb.png.8056e145685cfdf9f378013e0a556040.png

And yet some folks still believe QB is the main issue😒

Posted

Easy to see.  Replace Flood with a true OC & turn over play caller to him (Chip Kelly) and hire the Will Muschamp of Oline coaches to run the oline.  Call me crazy but whoever does strength & conditioning of oline needs replacing as well because our oline is worse now than any in last 25yrs.

Posted
54 minutes ago, HookedOnTF said:

Yes Sark and Arch could do their part to discourage DCs from a full frontal assault, but this sure is crazy to see:

ol-envy-2026.thumb.png.8056e145685cfdf9f378013e0a556040.png

Not saying we aren’t bad, cause we know we are on offense but who we have played compared to who Miami, ND, UCLA, BYU, Boise isn’t even close. 
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, HookedOnTF said:

Three out on a limb thoughts:
1) Is our DL too good for our OL's development? Even the DL twos are good enough that I wonder if they've broken the OL's confidence. Instead of developing, are the linemen spending every practice correcting mistakes? Iron sharpens aluminum?
2) Is the OL coach really the answer? Every time we've hired a "top 5 OL coach" since 2010, the result has been the same. Bill Bedenbaugh didn't forget how to coach either, and Oklahoma's line is struggling too. A big name college coach has to align with Sark, and an NFL OL coach might help with scheme and technique, but maybe not with developing 18-year-olds. So is it really as simple as firing Flood and throwing money at the next home-run hire with skins on the wall?
3) Is it strength? Becton has the team fast and well conditioned. The DL anchors well but doesn't really penetrate (bonus pts for big man tuddys), and the OL looks weak. A few years ago I think we brought Dana LeDuc back to work on strength. Is he still around? Is strength training part of the OL's struggle, or do they just not know what to do in live fire? 

Dana is retired and living in Austin's Onion Creek for most of the Year. The summer he's in Seattle.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, SB21 said:

Not saying we aren’t bad, cause we know we are on offense but who we have played compared to who Miami, ND, UCLA, BYU, Boise isn’t even close. 
 

 

Was about to say the same thing.  Wonder how good our Oline would look if we were playing some of these other teams scheduled.

Posted
2 minutes ago, SB21 said:

Not saying we aren’t bad, cause we know we are on offense but who we have played compared to who Miami, ND, UCLA, BYU, Boise isn’t even close. 
 

 

Yeah the underlying data is not opponent adjusted so I added some small weighting factors, but directionally it makes even more sense when you look at our offense vs the supposedly weaker defenses.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.