Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Will be interesting. Tennessee both losses on the road. Ohio State losing to 7-5 Michigan at home and looking like a steaming pile doing it should knock them below the Vols in seeding. 

True, but they'll claim OSU's wins over Penn State and Indiana as two playoff teams outweighs Tennessee's best win over Alabama. 

Posted
Just now, John F. said:

Seeding are going to be based on rankings though. 

That’s not necessarily true with how they have the tie ins for byes. If it was truly based on rankings then Arizona st and Boise state wouldn’t be 3/4. I think they’ll present the bracket in a way that seeds similar to cbb selections then will do like a first 4 out kind of thing. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Agree, but replace Ohio State with Penn State ... since both just played in conference title game

If the committee does the right thing an goes 8 Tennessee hosting 9 Ohio State, the Vols will knock out the Buckeyes

Gerry hasn’t the committee said they’re not shuffling teams that didn’t play yesterday relative to each other? If so, Ohio St is locked in over Tennessee. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Hashtag said:

That’s not necessarily true with how they have the tie ins for byes. If it was truly based on rankings then Arizona st and Boise state wouldn’t be 3/4. I think they’ll present the bracket in a way that seeds similar to cbb selections then will do like a first 4 out kind of thing. 

The four highest ranked conference championships get the top four seeds. The fifth highest ranked gets a bid but no guaranteed seed. It’s solely based on rankings. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, John F. said:

The four highest ranked conference championships get the top four seeds. The fifth highest ranked gets a bid but no guaranteed seed. It’s solely based on rankings. 

Everything leading up to today is rankings for a tv show and to get engagement. Today is about seeding for a playoff. Don’t conflate those two things. 

  • Moderators
Posted
9 minutes ago, John F. said:

Gerry hasn’t the committee said they’re not shuffling teams that didn’t play yesterday relative to each other? If so, Ohio St is locked in over Tennessee. 

You are probably correct. 

It shouldn't be that way in terms of the rankings. They are just wrong. Ohio State lost at home to Michigan, scored 0 in the second half. Total BS. 

And I do believe it matters big time for who hosts (home crowd, potential weather, etc.)

But it is what it is. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Would be criminal if Alabama gets in over South Carolina. I know Bama won the game in Tuscaloosa first half of the season. 

But Alabama lost road games at Vanderbilt and Oklahoma (god dog walked against OU). South Carolina smoked both of those teams on the road, and is playing better football now. 

I totally agree, but Alabama being in the previous ranking and being idle, not sure South Carolina  (playing better and trending up) will jump them.  Best to just have a deserving SMU there at 11/12.  But what should be done and is done might be 2 different things.  And this 12 team playoff was suppose to remedy controversy. 

Edited by Austalgia
Posted

My best guess is ACC is 11 and 12.

Texas-SMU, Penn State-Clemson and Notre Dame-Indiana.

5 v 12, 6 v 11, and 7 v 10.

There is precedent for still ranking a team like SMU that lost to Clemson higher than who they lost to.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Truth is, if we're seeded five or six, the loss to Georgia in the SEC title game won't really hurt us. Fifth would probably be better, but either of those draws should set us up to make the semifinal against Georgia or Oregon.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Would be criminal if Alabama gets in over South Carolina. I know Bama won the game in Tuscaloosa first half of the season. 

But Alabama lost road games at Vanderbilt and Oklahoma (god dog walked against OU). South Carolina smoked both of those teams on the road, and is playing better football now. 

South Carolina would best Asu , Smu, indiana…boise…… tossup Nd , osu, penn state, tenneseee…and Texas

Sellers and that south carolina team no one wants to play! 

  • Moderators
Posted
1 minute ago, Joe Naural said:

South Carolina would best Asu , Smu, indiana…boise…… tossup Nd , osu, penn state, tenneseee…and Texas

Sellers and that south carolina team no one wants to play! 

100% agree

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Joe Naural said:

South Carolina would best Asu , Smu, indiana…boise…… tossup Nd , osu, penn state, tenneseee…and Texas

Sellers and that south carolina team no one wants to play! 

I'd rather play South Carolina than Tennessee. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Agree, but replace Ohio State with Penn State ... since both just played in conference title game

If the committee does the right thing an goes 8 Tennessee hosting 9 Ohio State, the Vols will knock out the Buckeyes

I refer back to your comments on the OTF rapid reaction regarding the committee's makeup. The committee won't do the right thing!

Posted
38 minutes ago, Joe Naural said:

South Carolina would best Asu , Smu, indiana…boise…… tossup Nd , osu, penn state, tenneseee…and Texas

Sellers and that south carolina team no one wants to play! 

I agree with this caveat, Texas beats SC.  Full disclosure of bias, I still have cool aid left and I’m a homer, but we are good against running QBs when we prepare for them, and though they have a pass rush, it’s not complemented with the linebackers Georgia has.  Don’t get me wrong, their linebackers are good, but not elite with the instincts and speed of Georgia. Think we could score.  

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

We will see if TV sets and money play a part in the decisions pretty quick.  SMU draws Dallas and Texas market, but not the national viewership Alabama does.  Again, I don’t care, my pony is Texas, but what should happen and what might happen could be different. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Joe Naural said:

South Carolina would best Asu , Smu, indiana…boise…… tossup Nd , osu, penn state, tenneseee…and Texas

Sellers and that south carolina team no one wants to play! 

I'm not on the Sellers bandwagon. I'll bet he suffers the proverbial sophomore slump next season.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.