Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Finally sat down and watched the press conference in its entirety. How does Kirk Bohls find a way to always ask the one question that is so stupid that the coach can’t and won’t answer? It’s really quite a skill.

  • Haha 2
  • Moderators
Posted
47 minutes ago, Caden Kuykendall said:

I’m excited to see which portal guys Texas truly goes after

Exactly. Make contact ... there will be many. All part of the process of vetting.

Bring on campus for a visit ... then it's real.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

I notice CDC mentioned they did a thorough background check on Miller, and he didn't have any "NCAA violations" on his record. Neither does Beard. Beard doesn't have any criminal violations on his record either. CDC also mentioned "court of public opinion." That's pretty ironic.

  • Haha 1
Posted

By the way, I have nothing against Miller. Seems to be a really good coach. My point is that we had a great coach and allowed what CDC himself called the "court of public opinion" to dictate his status. Now we have another coach who was run out of town by the "court of public opinion" at Arizona. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, harveycmd said:

By the way, I have nothing against Miller. Seems to be a really good coach. My point is that we had a great coach and allowed what CDC himself called the "court of public opinion" to dictate his status. Now we have another coach who was run out of town by the "court of public opinion" at Arizona. 

image.gif.d9b350f785d26e5420d98bf9639fd600.gif

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, harveycmd said:

I notice CDC mentioned they did a thorough background check on Miller, and he didn't have any "NCAA violations" on his record. Neither does Beard. Beard doesn't have any criminal violations on his record either. CDC also mentioned "court of public opinion." That's pretty ironic.

The only reason Beard doesn’t is because his fiancé refused to cooperate with authorities after the fact. Regardless of being prosecuted or not the affidavit cites that Beard threw her on the floor, bit her, choked her(restricted breathing), and etc. so he still beat a woman even if he wasn’t prosecuted. How can you Beard honks not get this through your heads?

 

Also know that CDC and and the powers that be gave Beard options that could have kept him at Texas. He’s was to arrogant to take those options and instead lashed out like an immature child via his lawyers statements. 

Edited by Hashtag
Posted
8 hours ago, Jordan91 said:

Coach Millers job to get the best players. Getting harder to do with the ever growing BS money some want. 

Yep, but someones probably gonna pay it. 

NIL in college basketball vs college football are two different animals. A guy I follow once said NIL (football) means your main competitor most of the time is the dumbest one, the program willing to outspend for a single blue chip who becomes one of 22. Best example was TT buying Micah Hudson, when they could have allocated the same money for a handful of players to transform for their terrible defense. Just bad NIL management.

Basketball NIL goes to a player(s) whose going to be one of 5 and can make a significant impact on your season. And theres probably 120 teams that can afford to pay one guy top dollar. The top 30 programs have more competition now than ever to secure the commitment of the best players. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Hashtag said:

The only reason Beard doesn’t is because his fiancé refused to cooperate with authorities after the fact. Regardless of being prosecuted or not the affidavit cites that Beard threw her on the floor, bit her, choked her(restricted breathing), and etc. so he still beat a woman even if he wasn’t prosecuted. How can you Beard honks not get this through your heads?

 

Also know that CDC and and the powers that be gave Beard options that could have kept him at Texas. He’s was to arrogant to take those options and instead lashed out like an immature child via his lawyers statements. 

I can sign an affidavit saying I saw Santa Clause drop down the chimney. Doesn't make it true or false. It's still "court of public opinion."  Maybe Beard lashed out because he thought he was right. Doesn't prove he was. Doesn't prove he wasn't. Let's see: Beard's free and clear with a crap team in the sweet sixteen. We're hiring a coach to replace his replacement. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

I can sign an affidavit saying I saw Santa Clause drop down the chimney. Doesn't make it true or false. It's still "court of public opinion."  Maybe Beard lashed out because he thought he was right. Doesn't prove he was. Doesn't prove he wasn't. Let's see: Beard's free and clear with a crap team in the sweet sixteen. We're hiring a coach to replace his replacement. 

Good job defending a woman beater! 

Posted (edited)

 

image.png.75563277fa586007a9cf14425de5c7ea.png

 

So how do you diminish the police in this situation have their evidence documented as well as photos from that night while you continue to parade the FBI recordings? Continue supporting a woman beating alcoholic. 

Edited by Hashtag
Posted

Ther

1 minute ago, Hashtag said:

 

image.png.75563277fa586007a9cf14425de5c7ea.png

 

 

But yeah continue supporting a woman beating alcoholic. 

Again, there are affidavits swearing people saw big foot. Absent epistemologically verifiable evidence, we don't know.

Posted
2 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

Ther

Again, there are affidavits swearing people saw big foot. Absent epistemologically verifiable evidence, we don't know.

Yeah I guess police taking photos of the victim and and noting they saw visible marks from the assault is nothing. Got it. You're pathetic 

Posted (edited)

Photos don't prove who did what unless the photo shows the perpetrator in the act. They're photos. Conversely, FBI recordings of Miller are pretty definitive. You can say it's not a big deal because rules have changed. If the law changes on "beating women," will that change Beard's status?

Edited by harveycmd
Posted
16 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

Did you see him beat the woman?

Here's the problem with sports in today's world. If you can win games, we can suspend reality and give someone 5, 2nd chances. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

We would have a better team if Beard was still here, but it was his time to go. Glad to see him on campus when we hired him, glad to see him go when he did.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

Photos don't prove who did what unless the photo shows the perpetrator in the act. They're photos. Conversely, FBI recordings of Miller are pretty definitive. You can say it's not a big deal because rules have changed. If the law changes on "beating women," will that change Beard's status?

Congrats for being a piece of crap I suppose. I'm done with this conversation.

Posted
Just now, Ace Recruiter said:

Here's the problem with sports in today's world. If you can win games, we can suspend reality and give someone 5, 2nd chances. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

We would have a better team if Beard was still here, but it was his time to go. Glad to see him on campus when we hired him, glad to see him go when he did.

I'm guessing Arizona would say the same thing about Miller.

Posted
7 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

I'm guessing Arizona would say the same thing about Miller.

Youre guessing? You mean you don't have statements and recordings from today's date stating the entire University of Arizona feels that way?

See we can both play that game

Posted
33 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

Did you see him beat the woman?

So you believe CDC and the University did not do their own investigation?  I guarantee they know a lot more about what happened than we do.  Beard was due $15 million if he was not fired for cause.  Why didn't he sue if he was innocent?  A logical guess is he did not want those reports to see the light of day

  • Hook 'Em 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.