Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

If you actually believe Texas pushed for and didn’t land all 8 of these guys, you must be new to recruiting.

Just because a guy officially visited Texas doesn’t mean it is a “miss” if he doesn’t commit here. Texas brought in 44 official visitors for a class that will under 30 guys.

Edited by Assistant Regional Manager
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

If you actually believe Texas pushed for and didn’t land all 8 of these guys, you must be new to recruiting.

Just because a guy officially visited Texas doesn’t mean it is a “miss” if he doesn’t commit here. Texas brought in 44 official visitors for a class that will under 30 guys.

Which ones do you think we didn’t push for?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Lmao the panic thread gotta love it, we will be fine. The staff is going to have like 20+ isn commits from the guys we really want then we can focus on getting the cherry’s on top to finish off the class like the past 2 years 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, drag worm said:

Which ones do you think we didn’t push for?

Maybe push for isn’t the right phrase, but the very site said we decided not to match the NIL for Simeon. Don’t think we were sweating Henderson’s decision today knowing that will go all the way to December. Krempin and Roseborough we didn’t have slotted into spots where it was worth the NIL.

When Bryce Perry Wright announces for A&M “over Texas” next week are we going to consider that a miss? When we stopped going all in after getting Wesley.

Not all decisions are equal.

Edited by Assistant Regional Manager
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

I don’t have any real problem with where Texas sits right now.

Texas has lost exactly one recruit where the Horns’ NIL offer matched or exceeded someone else’s and that was to a home-state team (Crowell).

Texas does not have unlimited NIL. Neither do other teams, though some are acting like it.

Let me ask you all this: are any of the players left on the board worth 1/15th of your entire roster salary cap? Maybe there might be but that number is few and far between.

Today alone, Henderson and Guervil just went for those amounts.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted

At what point do you push the "panic" button??  Texas has done well at the end of cycles.  My only issue is playing russian roulette year after year and hoping you dont end up with snake eyes.  Just food for thought.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said:

I don’t have any real problem with where Texas sits right now.

Texas has lost exactly one recruit where the Horns’ NIL offer matched or exceeded someone else’s and that was to a home-state team (Crowell).

Texas does not have unlimited NIL. Neither do other teams, though some are acting like it.

Let me ask you all this: are any of the players left on the board worth 1/15th of your entire roster salary cap? Maybe there might be but that number is few and far between.

Today alone, Henderson and Guervil just went for those amounts.

Bobby a lot of people have been asking why we keep calling it a roster cap when NIL as we have known it isn’t going away. There is a cap on university funds, for sure, but why are y’all talking like that’s the total amount that can be spent on a class when NIL deals are still on the table?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

It seems to me that missing out on a recruit that is making it all about the NIL isn't much of a loss. Most likely, they'll be the first ones to transfer if they don't get an NIL raise down the road. What you want are the recruits that see the big picture...NFL caliber development, great education, life-long connections, incremental NIL opportunities in a thriving city and state, etc, in addition to a fair initial NIL package. Those are the guys that will stick around for 3-5 years while they develop and earn playing time. It's a tough balance to achieve, but Sark seems to be good at it so far.

Posted
7 minutes ago, TXFF said:

It seems to me that missing out on a recruit that is making it all about the NIL isn't much of a loss. Most likely, they'll be the first ones to transfer if they don't get an NIL raise down the road. What you want are the recruits that see the big picture...NFL caliber development, great education, life-long connections, incremental NIL opportunities in a thriving city and state, etc, in addition to a fair initial NIL package. Those are the guys that will stick around for 3-5 years while they develop and earn playing time. It's a tough balance to achieve, but Sark seems to be good at it so far.

Our roster is full of players who took the highest NIL deal. Especially in the 25 class. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, drag worm said:

Our roster is full of players who took the highest NIL deal. Especially in the 25 class. 

So all the NIL packages offered by all the other schools were available to you to draw that conclusion? I'm impressed!

Posted
11 minutes ago, TXFF said:

So all the NIL packages offered by all the other schools were available to you to draw that conclusion? I'm impressed!


Yep. All posted in the newsletter. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Bobby Burton said:

I don’t have any real problem with where Texas sits right now.

Texas has lost exactly one recruit where the Horns’ NIL offer matched or exceeded someone else’s and that was to a home-state team (Crowell).

Texas does not have unlimited NIL. Neither do other teams, though some are acting like it.

Let me ask you all this: are any of the players left on the board worth 1/15th of your entire roster salary cap? Maybe there might be but that number is few and far between.

Today alone, Henderson and Guervil just went for those amounts.

The problem is we are operating like there is a salary cap, while our competitors are not. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, drag worm said:

Bobby a lot of people have been asking why we keep calling it a roster cap when NIL as we have known it isn’t going away. There is a cap on university funds, for sure, but why are y’all talking like that’s the total amount that can be spent on a class when NIL deals are still on the table?

There's not a "cap," but there is a limit to viable NIL funds. I've been on record saying there is almost no chance this "clearing house" entity withstands higher judicial scrutiny. Even so, that doesn't mean that the NIL market won't become more stable. As that plays out over the next couple of years, there is good reason to be cautious about monetary risk in an unstable market. Texas will not have a talent deficiency in the next couple of years.

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.