SWTHorn Posted yesterday at 02:20 PM Posted yesterday at 02:20 PM https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/47081170/art-briles-coach-division-ii-eastern-new-mexico 2 Quote
RKR at DKR Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Eastern New Mexico obviously does not have a PR department, truly stupid. 1 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 19 hours ago Moderators Posted 19 hours ago ENM will make a run in DII by year two IMO 2 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 19 hours ago Moderators Posted 19 hours ago 1 mill buyout if Art leaves inside of three seasons ... wow! Quote
AusMOJO Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago I don't have a problem with the hire, don't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. From what I've read about the situation, wasn't he found to have no wrong doing in a court of law? I mean the University is the one who covered it up and they pretty much got a slap on the wrist and kept it pushing. Briles is the one who bore the brunt of the punishment and was scapegoated, along with several other key figures. In saying all that, he deserves a chance at redemption and should be heavily monitored. That's just what I've read about the situation, so I could be wrong. 2 Quote
Shmatt Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 minute ago, AusMOJO said: I don't have a problem with the hire, don't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. From what I've read about the situation, wasn't he found to have no wrong doing in a court of law? I mean the University is the one who covered it up and they pretty much got a slap on the wrist and kept it pushing. Briles is the one who bore the brunt of the punishment and was scapegoated, along with several other key figures. In saying all that, he deserves a chance at redemption and should be heavily monitored. That's just what I've read about the situation, so I could be wrong. just gotta look into his texts that leaked and that says everything. Even if he was the scapegoat he still knew what was going on and took the money over doing the right thing. 1 Quote
AusMOJO Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Shmatt said: just gotta look into his texts that leaked and that says everything. Even if he was the scapegoat he still knew what was going on and took the money over doing the right thing. But as I said, what I read is that he was found to have done no wrong doing in a court of law? Was that before or after the texts leaked? Quote
Shmatt Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 12 minutes ago, AusMOJO said: But as I said, what I read is that he was found to have done no wrong doing in a court of law? Was that before or after the texts leaked? Before and that honestly dosent mean much either. Trust me a lot of cases are settled even if the person is in the wrong, thats just called having a very good lawyer. He did hide stuff and he did turn a blind eye to it, 15+ women don’t just stay stuff like that either man that’s not a coincidence. The school used him as a scapegoat but the truth of the matter is they are all guilty. 1 Quote
AusMOJO Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Shmatt said: Before and that honestly dosent mean much either. Trust me a lot of cases are settled even if the person is in the wrong, thats just called having a very good lawyer. He did hide stuff and he did turn a blind eye to it, 15+ women don’t just stay stuff like that either man that’s not a coincidence. The school used him as a scapegoat but the truth of the matter is they are all guilty. So they leaked before and he was still found to have done no wrong doing? That doesn't seem like that would fly if the evidence was clear as day.....I don't know what to think, I'll have to go do some more research myself. Quote
Shmatt Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Just now, AusMOJO said: So they leaked before and he was still found to have done no wrong doing? That doesn't seem like that would fly if the evidence was clear as day.....I don't know what to think, I'll have to go do some more research myself. They didn’t convict him because legally what he did wasn’t against the law cause he didn’t do the crimes himself. But that doesn’t hide the fact that he put football over what was going on in the locker room. Either way there is no use to defend this man, he did contribute to a toxic culture. 2 Quote
FAFO Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago oh will yall shut the hell up? why has no one at all, since all this made a big deal about Ian being the AD at Liberty? he didn’t know anything either?… the court said he was innocent. he’s been away damn near 10 years. move on. 1 Quote
Shmatt Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Just now, FAFO said: oh will yall shut the hell up? why has no one at all, since all this made a big deal about Ian being the AD at Liberty? he didn’t know anything either?… the court said he was innocent. he’s been away damn near 10 years. move on. Nasty comment man, so all the victims are just supposed to move on essentially because it was 10 years ago? This a tread about this specific topic I think we can talk about it here lmao 1 Quote
FAFO Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Shmatt said: Nasty comment man, so all the victims are just supposed to move on essentially because it was 10 years ago? This a tread about this specific topic I think we can talk about it here lmao i don’t think Briles was the one doing what was done… right? 1 Quote
Shmatt Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 5 minutes ago, FAFO said: i don’t think Briles was the one doing what was done… right? I mean no but, sliding it under the rug and letting those kids play knowing the misconduct taking place is still quite vile 1 Quote
FootLaw Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago He has an unpleasant history outside of Baylor. No thank you. Sounds about right for Portales though. Quote
General Grant Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) F him. Trash human. Trash family. Edited 3 hours ago by General Grant 1 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, FAFO said: oh will yall shut the hell up? why has no one at all, since all this made a big deal about Ian being the AD at Liberty? he didn’t know anything either?… the court said he was innocent. he’s been away damn near 10 years. move on. Briles is a rape enabler. He knew. Briles is a POS . Hope he suffers his while life. 2 Quote
General Grant Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, Shmatt said: Nasty comment man, so all the victims are just supposed to move on essentially because it was 10 years ago? This a tread about this specific topic I think we can talk about it here lmao I don’t care to respond to him. I do wonder if he knows any rape victims. I do in my close family. It doesnt end for the victims. So move on? Nope. I never will. Damn Briles and his family for eternity. 2 3 Quote
diegozanna20 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 13 hours ago, AusMOJO said: So they leaked before and he was still found to have done no wrong doing? That doesn't seem like that would fly if the evidence was clear as day.....I don't know what to think, I'll have to go do some more research myself. Wanting evidence to be clear as day in a case involving rape... 🤦♂️ You can immediately tell when someone is talking out of their ass. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.