TexasFanatic Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago Given that we are punting on this 2026 HS close, it sure looks like it. Texas needs to lane 5/6 NFL draft picks in the portal this cycle. RB, OL, WR, DB, LB 2 Quote
snugsie Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago From what we have seen so far Texas will pay up for prime talent but won't match "crazy" offers and may get beat on top line talent. With that said we will win our share of who we want. I hope we are aggressive though. Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 16 hours ago Author Posted 16 hours ago 20 minutes ago, snugsie said: From what we have seen so far Texas will pay up for prime talent but won't match "crazy" offers and may get beat on top line talent. With that said we will win our share of who we want. I hope we are aggressive though. Texas needs to stop with that mindset. They need to do what Ohio State did 2 1 Quote
drag worm Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Texas needs to stop with that mindset. They need to do what Ohio State did that would have included retaining the Juniors who left last season. Could you imagine this team with Ewers, Banks, Williams, and Golden? Edited 16 hours ago by drag worm Quote
NothinButDaHorns34 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, drag worm said: that would have included retaining the Juniors who left last season. Could you imagine this team with Ewers, Banks, Williams, and Golden? I wouldn’t want to imagine ewers back without kelvin and cam. He would’ve been killed if he was pressured like arch early in the season. Edited 13 hours ago by NothinButDaHorns34 3 1 Quote
horns96 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 3 hours ago, TexasFanatic said: Texas needs to lane 5/6 NFL draft picks in the portal this cycle. RB, OL, WR, DB, LB Life isn't a video game. 1 Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago 23 minutes ago, horns96 said: Life isn't a video game. Ohio State did it. 1 Quote
Pound Town Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, horns96 said: Life isn't a video game. Unfortunately (?), CFB is a video game now in terms of managing a team and buying a roster. Quote
Nuufaola Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago All the teams have the same amount to spend via revenue share. We also have the best reach, so our NIL deals (which are outside the salary cap) should be the best. We do not (and will not) have a mechanism to pay cash under the table. Texas is only limited by the law (or SEC/NCAA rules). We can come up with any amount of money we need. Some of the posts above confuse the current roster (i.e., there was no cap before this summer) and next years roster. 1 Quote
jkates Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Spending big isn't necessarily the answer. Hitting on the players you spend on is the answer. Texas must hit on transfers - as it did with Mosley or Kanu - without a high whiff rate - like Niblack. Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 46 minutes ago Moderators Posted 46 minutes ago My estimation is they absolutely will. We will see how it plays out, but I am expecting Texas to be as active in the portal this year as they ever have been under Sarkisian. In a way, I expect it to be an overcorrection from last year. Every position will be reviewed and will be on the table for additions out of the portal. 1 Quote
4thandFive Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: My estimation is they absolutely will. We will see how it plays out, but I am expecting Texas to be as active in the portal this year as they ever have been under Sarkisian. In a way, I expect it to be an overcorrection from last year. Every position will be reviewed and will be on the table for additions out of the portal. Good. Because Arch is gonna be a monster. 1 Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 29 minutes ago Author Posted 29 minutes ago 37 minutes ago, jkates said: Spending big isn't necessarily the answer. Hitting on the players you spend on is the answer. Texas must hit on transfers - as it did with Mosley or Kanu - without a high whiff rate - like Niblack. I think you are mostly right, but if a guy like Coleman and/or Baugh enter, you don’t need to worry about a bidding war. You get those players by any means necessary. If you add those two players, you become the favorite especially if you add a few OL and DBs too 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 29 minutes ago Moderators Posted 29 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, 4thandFive said: Good. Because Arch is gonna be a monster. I think he will be as well. 1 Quote
Steamboat Willie Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago This cycle is portal or bust. If we’re “punting” on a big HS close, then Sark better roll into the portal like a Jeff Bezos drunk at an art auction. We don’t need projects. We need grown men: RB, two OL, at least one DB, a safety who can tackle, and a LB who scares people. Arch’s window is right now, not after three developmental seasons and a prayer. The difference isn’t money — it’s hitting on the buys. Spend big, evaluate better, and stop pretending last year’s portal nap was some 4D chess move. CJ basically told us it’s about to be an overcorrection — good. Overcorrect hard. Bottom line: If we don’t come out of this portal cycle with multiple instant starters, then we’re officially wasting a once-in-a-generation QB. . Quote
Forrest J. Posted 12 minutes ago Posted 12 minutes ago 31 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: My estimation is they absolutely will. We will see how it plays out, but I am expecting Texas to be as active in the portal this year as they ever have been under Sarkisian. In a way, I expect it to be an overcorrection from last year. Every position will be reviewed and will be on the table for additions out of the portal. We were very active in the portal last year, just didn’t get many if any difference makers. Still 🤞🏾 for Mosley and Watson to be difference makers. Another year of volume c+ level players isn’t going to cut it. Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted 11 minutes ago Posted 11 minutes ago 31 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: My estimation is they absolutely will. We will see how it plays out, but I am expecting Texas to be as active in the portal this year as they ever have been under Sarkisian. In a way, I expect it to be an overcorrection from last year. Every position will be reviewed and will be on the table for additions out of the portal. I wouldn’t be surprised if part of that overcorrection includes more attrition than we’re used to seeing. Possibly including some big names. Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 9 minutes ago Moderators Posted 9 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Tuco Ramirez said: I wouldn’t be surprised if part of that overcorrection includes more attrition than we’re used to seeing. Possibly including some big names. I'm also accounting for this to be the case as well. Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 5 minutes ago Moderators Posted 5 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Forrest J. said: We were very active in the portal last year, just didn’t get many if any difference makers. Still 🤞🏾 for Mosley and Watson to be difference makers. Another year of volume c+ level players isn’t going to cut it. Texas brought in 11 players a year ago out of the portal, many are contributors – Watson, Endries, Mosley, Kanu, Spence, Brevard plus the two specialists. What I mean by overcorrection in my original post is guys like Emmanuel Pregnon, Max Klare, Eric Singleton, etc. they don't leave campus uncommitted. Texas has done well at finding value in their portal pickups lately – and don't get me wrong, that is very important. But there should be no reason to penny pinch as long as your QB is Arch Manning. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.