The presidential commission surrounding college sports issued its first form of potential guidelines yesterday. You can read them in the tweet I linked below.
It’s a comprehensive list of reforms. As should be expected, there’s some good, some bad and a whole lot of work to be done.
But at least someone is attempting to move things forward.
Perhaps the biggest news?
They are suggesting an entirely new form of governance, one largely outside of the NCAA or perhaps without the NCAA altogether.
Other major line items of note:
- A phased pooling of rights if 75-percent of colleges agree to it. (They don’t say which 75-percent have to comply). The ACC is called out here because some of their rights don’t renew until the mid-2030s while other conferences renew sooner.
- Absolute minimums for women’s sports.
- Caps on player compensation with the intention of strict adherence.
- The potential of tiered media compensation. So Texas might make more than SMU, Houston, etc.
- The creation of a managing board and an executive director.
**
My general take is that this is a major overreach.
Rather than simply allow all schools to spend what they want and how they want, they suggest allowing the 75-percent to dictate and force what the 25-percent can do.
Here’s the problem with that. In college sports, at least from an advertising/money perspective, the dollars are very much about the top 25-percent not the remaining 75.
Some of these ideas are a starting point for sure. But it’s definitely not an ending point.
As currently considered, it cedes way too much to the schools that actually don’t generate much revenue. It’s cloaked as helping maintain funding for women’s sports, but it’s really just a redistribution of wealth.
This proposal, as currently constructed, would not be good for the University of Texas. It would be good for Texas Tech though. And therein lies the problem.
**