AusMOJO

What room do they have in the WR room? You will likely return all 4 starters. You're already paying the current crop of Fr too much and then you have the next group of Fr inbound soon. Where is there room to add a WR? I'm not trying to be a d*ck or anything but there is no point in going after a WR unless you lose a bunch of these guys. Especially with rev sharing kicking in next year, how does that affect things?

It's just the way it is, especially with positions of actual need elsewhere. All 4 starting WR's should be back and then you have the current Fr and then the incoming Fr. I could see a few guys leaving but not enough to justify taking somebody there. Let alone the one everyone wants in Coleman.

Unless some of the guys in the WR room leave, we're not getting anyone in the portal at WR.

1 RB 2-3 IOL 1 DT/NT 1 Edge or LB 1 CB 1-2 S 1 K 1 P

I guess we'll see how Kibble, Coleman twins and Christian go. If Goosby comes back, my guess is they give Brooks a full off-season training at G instead of just throwing him in there mid game. Maybe they see if Cojoe comes back if he would want to move inside? Don't really know. See if you can portal a few guys for competition.

I like this kid, should take a few years to fill out and get ready but overall a good take. Him and the RB we got yesterday are great takes.

Somehow I completely skipped over that post lol. Thank you.

So they leaked before and he was still found to have done no wrong doing? That doesn't seem like that would fly if the evidence was clear as day.....I don't know what to think, I'll have to go do some more research myself.

Okay we can't just take very decommit and portal OL that shows up lol. It looks like we did have an offer out to him, but so did every other big time program. If he's from Cali, I probably look to see him land at a program around there. USC, Oregon, Washington, etc. Maybe even Utah or BYU.

I'm not a big soccer fan, let alone women's soccer, but I had been following a long with a user on reddit that was posting about the games and it seemed like we were struggling big time this year. Wish the old coach all the best and hope we hire a good replacement. I see a lot of people talking about the UCLA HC? Can anyone give a brief overview of why that is a better hire than what we had?

But as I said, what I read is that he was found to have done no wrong doing in a court of law? Was that before or after the texts leaked?

Okay and? That has nothing to do with what I said lol.

I don't have a problem with the hire, don't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. From what I've read about the situation, wasn't he found to have no wrong doing in a court of law? I mean the University is the one who covered it up and they pretty much got a slap on the wrist and kept it pushing. Briles is the one who bore the brunt of the punishment and was scapegoated, along with several other key figures. In saying all that, he deserves a chance at redemption and should be heavily monitored. That's just what I've read about the situation, so I could be wrong.

Yeah but Arkansas' D is flat out terrible lol. It didn't look good the previous week against a Georgia team that isn't that good defensively.

Well, does he also have better weapons around him? That's important, too. Compared to the last couple of years, there is a significant drop in talent with the previous guys to these guys.

Not to try and compare too much, but he's also statistically having a better first year starting than Ewers, although Ewers was younger when he first started. I'm proud of the way he's battled through the season. Now we just hope Sark can put the pieces around him to elevate to the next level.

Some people are just better at the college level, maybe Sark can give him a ring and we can go win a natty next year. Joking of course, we all know Sark isn't going to hand the offense off to someone else. Although it would be pretty funny to hire him and see where it goes.

PK right now:

That's funny because I could've sworn PK's D carried the team the last couple of years. Otherwise we would've had a few more losses with some porous offense at times. If those are the guys they're recruiting than it works counter to what PK likes to do and that is run zone coverage. So either Sark did no research when hiring PK or he's forcing him to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to. I'd say a lot of the blame is placed on Akina, I mean two weeks installing a scheme they ran against Georgia that did absolutely nothing but confuse the secondary even more lol. So now I guess we're back on the "it's all PK's fault and he needs to be fired" train, but anyone else under performs and it's silly to talk about it. I don't disagree that it's been bad this year, but there seems to be a lot of disconnect between what Sark wants, what PK runs and then what Nansen and Akina input. Too many cooks in the kitchen.

Not so sure it's bend but don't break he wants to play. Because they are one of the top teams in the country for sacks and they get plenty of pressure. There was a clear progression year over year with the secondary. Gideon/Joseph gone and an entire new room of DB coaches. Maybe they don't mesh well, maybe there's too many cooks in the kitchen, who knows. But apparently now PK is the problem lol. I can't say it isn't surprising though, I knew there would be a drop off but I didn't think it would be this big of a drop off.

I'm not sure we let him flip, as much as he wanted to stay closer to home and he has family that played there, no?

You had TE's that could run it or that he actually utilized out of it. It's never really been that great blocking wise but this year might be one of the worst it's been. He should stick with 11 and go to 10, see what's what.

Well pretty much everyone won, so gg? Lol. It seems like OU is similar to Texas last year. Good D and terrible O. Also, what was with that score with Georgia? All of a sudden they don't look as good offensively against some weak team lol.

I'm not sure what Sark's fascination is with 12 personnel? If you want to run it, recruit actual TE's not tweener WR's.