Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Sark always plays the starters late no matter what. There are certain things he just doesn’t change (same with substitutions or changing starters out during the season)
  3. @Bobby Burton @Gerry HamiltonQuick question. Is there any reason why we shouldn't have seen KJ for the entire 4th quarter? The game was won. At some point we must let him get some REAL game time. I'm just confused why we refuse to get our backup QB some valuable time. I know almost all of our games have been close, but yesterday was the opportunity. I'm just saying.
  4. The ones I’ve noticed the most are Sikorsky and Robertson. Not saying anything about Baker, just that those two whiffing stunts have been very noticeable for me
  5. PK was the scapegoat for Sark last off season. He shouldn’t get another scapegoat. Two years of failure directly on the HC if we don’t make the playoff.
  6. Some of us didn’t watch the game, bro. That’s good he had his best game. Was it #56 giving up the inside pressure? Maybe it was him. I hear someone was losing the twist and stunts.
  7. I wonder what it would have looked like had we gotten the two Michigan guys and what would’ve been said had that line gelled and done well. Sikorski was supposed to be a backup and I’m fairly certain Robertson wasn’t first choice either. Sometimes you get stuck with fallback options. It happens even more now in the NIL days. It’s frustrating for sure, but Flood has still produced some great lineman on the edges. Not sure what the issue is in the middle other than, like I said, we had to go with what we’re supposed to be backups as opposed to first choice. I think they need to go back to Cojoe at left and Siani at right though bc that line actually got push on the left last week and moving people around mid season is never a great result in any league.
  8. Fire Miller at that point.
  9. Do not understand how we are almost always favored.
  10. It is funny that everyone on here is trashing Baker and on the other site a former UT All-American and many year NFL OL said he had the best game of any offensive lineman.
  11. Flood needs to go no matter what. If the bar was set with PK last year being let go because he simply wasn't good enough, well, he was better than flood, by alot!
  12. Exactly because the QBs are just a symptom of the ultimate problem.
  13. I haven’t checked in a while - what is Texas ATS this year? Cannot be great. I’d take Mizz this weekend if forced to bet.
  14. it'll be the same thing with KJ, or Dia.
  15. I'm the same. You can still pull for the kid and still acknowledge his shortcomings... And Sark's.
  16. Card/Thompson years: Sark just needs his QB Ewers years: Ewers is the problem. Arch will be the fix Arch years: Arch is the problem and can’t run Sark’s offense can we admit what the common denominator is and that Sark has largely been an average OC is his career minus the year he OC’d under the greatest coach in college sports with one of the most talented offenses ever assembled?
  17. Could have fooled the whole board there boss you have been the biggest arch hater there is
  18. Dang, I really have not liked Baker’s play. I was hoping there was some positive changes to the oline happening.
  19. It should have stayed that way Baker has been trash at RG
  20. PK was infinitely better than flood. If sark cares about winning, at all, flood is fired the day after they lose the last game. Either he's a bad coach or he can't coach his group.
  21. It looked like Baker had an injury or something because you can see him motioning to the sideline that he needed to come off the field. Laurence Seymore came in for two or three plays and Sikorski went to right guard. Seymore didn't come back into the game until the second unit was in on the offense's last drive.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.