All Activity

With the future of the ACC very uncertain, this is an even more risky hire by NC State. They may be paying Rivers a buyout at the same time the ACC is blowing up and schools like NC State have no guarantees of a soft landing and a lucrative media deal. Why not just hire a real football coach instead of a favorite son gimmick? How has hiring inexperienced, high profile former professional alums worked for college basketball programs? Chris Mullen, Patrick Ewing, Clyde Drexler, Penny Hardaway, Juwan Howard, etc…

Day at OSU feels like the end of the Mack era here... climbed the mountain, won, held on, lost his qb, lost the building... Really hard to sustain a dominant run. 🤘

Even with the NIL era and all that, they have to be close to losing that #1 class, right?

I thought he should've scored because you don't get a ton of chances to score defensive TD's but I understood what he was going for.

Who in their right mind would go to A&M at the moment? People are leaving there

Was it a one off gameplan or will Sark adapt to more of a spread offense? Coleman being out actually reduced the amount of shot plays that he ran it seemed, hopefully we see more of the same in Baton Rouge.

People are way overthinking this. It’s a non issue

Sanchez and Pettijohn are easy takes if they want in. I don't know much about the others.

Yep and that would potentially effect his Heisman voters too.

Grambling's Isaiah Miranda will be an interesting opponent. He's a 7'2" 230 athletic forward. He's a 4th year player who has bounced around a lot of small programs, but he's got some physical talent. He scored 29 points in Grambling's opener.

And stealing 2nd

Sanchez has UT on his radar with Muschamp as DC.

I don't understand Smith shutting it down for the year. He's being paid to play, so either play or forfeit your pay.

Legend Bey would be the guy I want on offense. Instantly addresses Slot WR opening for 2027, allowing Bishop to move out to X full-time. Effectively, replaces Easton Royal going forward.

It’s a smart play by Littleton. By taking a knee, Littleton cost Mizzou their 2 remaining timeouts AND burned another 50 seconds of clock time…while still giving Texas a two-score lead. The last part is the most inportant point: whether Texas ran the ball in for the TD, or simply took a knee 3 times and kicked the FG, the result is the same - a two score lead for Texas. Littleton’s choice simply cost Mizzou both timeouts and :50 seconds. By contrast, IF Littleton would’ve chosen to score the TD, then Mizzou has 1:40 to play and two timeouts, but they would still be trailing by two scores.

That plus its Senior Night for LSU so they'll definitely be up for it for sure.

His play would have only made sense, if Mizzou couldn't stop the clock. They had 2 timeouts and forced us into an awkward decision to either go for it or kick a FG. (I'm glad Sark punched it in) Graceson was overthinking it.

I don't think it's the end yet, but it's trending that way. Of course it depends on what we're defining as the trending down and the end. For me, the trending down is against the expectations that (again we've been spoiled) Texas is hosting until it gets to weekend where they have no choice but to travel, and really expect to be in the final four. While this is an absurdly high bar, it's one that Texas has achieved consistently. I disagree with the comparison to Stanford due to your point on NIL - the Stanfords of the world won't decide to compete in NIL and that's their choice. Texas has the resources where NIL should not be a factor - they may not be the best a la Nebraska, but they'll certainly be in the top tier. My personal expectation (whether realistic or not) is that Texas is a top 4 volleyball program year in and year out with Nebraska being the other one that has the same expectation. This might be because I started watching Texas volleyball when it was the Haley and Baily show and so have pretty much been spoiled with an elite program.

Where are you seeing 3-4 B1G teams? As of right now, its looking like UCLA & Indiana only for that conference. Its looking more like it'll be the following conference breakdown for the cfp: Notre Dame (1) G6 (1) - Boise St or New Mexico ACC (2) - Miami & Wake Forest Big 12 (2) - Utah & one of BYU/Tech B1G (2) - Indiana & UCLA SEC (4) - Georgia, Alabama, Texas & Tennessee

100% even the one he missed in the OU, had the distance just hooked it a bit.

You could just watch sets 2 and 3. Texas blasted Vanderbilt off the court in those two sets. Practically the entire team hit over .300. Stafford, Spears, Anderson, Bunton, and Harvey. Only Gaido didn't. It's a disappointing loss, but the team didn't play badly. Vanderbilt just played better. Oh, I should say Harris started the game but was pulled in favor of Swindle, so if you're a huge fan of Swindle there's that.