Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, Burnt Orange Horn said:

Similar things were said about Burrow before and after his first year at LSU.

It must be wonderful to have the gift of infallible prescience!

Bro I swear to god why are y’all still replying to me, you guys like Leavitt I get it move the **** on

Edited by diegozanna20
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Bunk Moreland said:

He should try to poach Frank Wilson, particularly given all the uncertainty around LSU retaining him. They might be able to go after Berry or Durham in the portal.

Berry is from NO, he isnt going anywhere, born and brainwashed Lsu. 

Wilson(not fully available yet) or Juluke (available)

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 hours ago, diegozanna20 said:

Me litterally 3 hours ago and lord knows how many posts ago saying "agree to disagree" while you and the other guys decided to keep the argument going:

I really don't care about Leavitt or talking about Leavitt and showed as much three hours ago.

And you're STILL going... what's your problem dude?
Can't handle people having different opinions on a MESSAGE BOARD about a player that has nothing to do with Texas?
Goodbye and hope you have a good rest of your day, for the third time.

And yet here you are, replying. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, AusMOJO said:

Surprised he wouldn't bring Chambliss with him. 

 

1 minute ago, Texas fan in Georgia said:

Chambliss is trying to get another year of eligibility.

And Leavitt is better 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

0 sacks, 8 pressures allowed in 2025.

6-3,305 

Only 152 total pass pro sets however.

We will need to bring in 4, maybe 5 portal OL. To not only fill the void of bad evaluations via quality depth but also compete for starting reps where the entire interior is up for grabs. 

  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, antcan95 said:

Does anyone know how our evaluation team compares to Indiana? They have an ELITE eye for talent, how’s our staff?

They do a fine job, no doubt.

They also start 10/11 players on offense on their 4th year or later of college football, several of which are 5th years. To me, that is just as important as any aspect of their roster seeing so much success.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

They do a fine job, no doubt.

They also start 10/11 players on offense on their 4th year or later of college football, several of which are 5th years. To me, that is just as important as any aspect of their roster seeing so much success.

Is their success sustainable? And if so we should aim to do the same.

  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, antcan95 said:

Is their success sustainable? And if so we should aim to do the same.

As long as they hit on their quarterbacks, they will be competitive. But it will essentially be solely based on transfer portal success.

Posted
11 minutes ago, antcan95 said:

Does anyone know how our evaluation team compares to Indiana? They have an ELITE eye for talent, how’s our staff?

Indiana has elite discipline that stems from their head coach that demands it. We do not have that. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, FaxMachine said:

Indiana has elite discipline that stems from their head coach that demands it. We do not have that. 

During Sark’s tenure we have to be one of the most undisciplined teams in the country. How does that get fixed? 

Posted
5 minutes ago, antcan95 said:

During Sark’s tenure we have to be one of the most undisciplined teams in the country. How does that get fixed? 

By being a different coach and personality. It’s not just something that you can just change. 

Posted
1 minute ago, FaxMachine said:

By being a different coach and personality. It’s not just something that you can just change. 

Is there too much of a “bro culture” amongst the coaches? Sark seems to care more about maintaining his friendships with Flood-Nansen-Banks than being a hardass 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.