Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The disrespect for Mosley and Wingo is wild to me. Wingo was all SEC 2nd team and he had his struggles. This is the same disrespect Xavier worthy got from you keyboard warrior Texas fans and remember how that worked out for the worthy haters 

Edited by Joe Zura
  • Hook 'Em 10
Posted
Just now, Longhornlove said:

They were literally the most reliable ball catchers on the team. We desperately need RBs, LBs and IOL before we even sniff a WR.

Because they are the most realible on our team doesnt mean 💩  if we are being real. Our team rn is not near natty level we are playing in the citrus bowl 😂. Wr also needs to be upgraded 

Posted
1 minute ago, Joe Zura said:

The disrespect for Mosley and Wingo is wild to me. Wingo was all SEC 2nd team and he had his struggles. This is the same disrespect Xavier worthy got for you keyboard warrior Texas fans and remember how that worked out for the worthy haters 

I mean, Worthy was disappointing relative to what his expectations were after his freshman season

Posted
Just now, Joe Zura said:

The disrespect for Mosley and Wingo is wild to me. Wingo was all SEC 2nd team and he had his struggles. This is the same disrespect Xavier worthy got from you keyboard warrior Texas fans and remember how that worked out for the worthy haters 

Too many trolls on this site. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Joe Zura said:

The disrespect for Mosley and Wingo is wild to me. Wingo was all SEC 2nd team and he had his struggles. This is the same disrespect Xavier worthy got from you keyboard warrior Texas fans and remember how that worked out for the worthy haters 

Their jobs as wide receivers is to catch the ball, not drop it. They deserve every bit of criticism they get.

Posted
3 minutes ago, FaxMachine said:

You do both in an “all in” season. Unless we are taking Jerry Jones and the Dallas Cowboys approach to all in. 

Lmao we don’t control that man, unless Texas pulls a usc and ignores the NCAA requests then cool go ahead. But if were operating in the cap than it has to be smart money instead of getting the shiny new toy.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, Shmatt said:

Lmao we don’t control that man, unless Texas pulls a usc and ignores the NCAA requests then cool go ahead. But if we’re operating in the cap than it has to be smart money instead of getting the shiny new toy.

There is no NIL cap. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Joe Zura said:

The disrespect for Mosley and Wingo is wild to me. Wingo was all SEC 2nd team and he had his struggles. This is the same disrespect Xavier worthy got from you keyboard warrior Texas fans and remember how that worked out for the worthy haters 

Throw parker in there also. Dude is legit

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bevohorns said:

Because they are the most realible on our team doesnt mean 💩  if we are being real. Our team rn is not near natty level we are playing in the citrus bowl 😂. Wr also needs to be upgraded 

You need an upright QB with time to throw the ball to them. Take care of the OL and RB room and if there is money left over for a WR, I'm all for it as long as he isn't a cancer. Overpaying for a WR is dangerous.

Posted

OL and RB are 100% more important needs and what the priority should be on offense.

With that being said, yall are insane if you think we don’t need an upgrade at WR. I do think all of Wingo, Livingstone, and Mosley will improve. Lockett, Ffrench, and McCutcheon could all become serviceable players.

We can’t risk and just hope on all of that though, and certainly can’t claim we’re “all in” by risking that. I don’t think we should overhaul the room or anything, but you only really need one WR out of the portal, especially if it’s a big time guy like Cam Coleman.

I don’t think we’ll get him, but some of yall acting as if we shouldn’t even be in the running is just insane to me.

Posted

2021 Georgia went 14-1 with their leading wide receiver catching 31 passes

 

2022 Georgia went 15-0 with their leading WR catching 50 passes

 

2023 Michigan went 15-0 with their leading War catching 48 passes

 

tell me again how you need elite receivers to win games? Allocate to the trenches and defensive depth. You absolutely can win it all next season with the receivers we have on this roster. 

  • Hook 'Em 6
Posted
5 minutes ago, FaxMachine said:

Because he’s exponentially better than any Wide receiver Texas has this year or last year. 
 

 

I see you just like to talk. All players stats last year so we can put this to bed. He's not that much better than what we already have, especially if we have to break the bank for it. If anything Mosley and Livingstone need more targets. 

Coleman 56 rec 708 yds 5td 12.6 per catch

Wingo 50 rec 770 yds 7td 15.4 per catch

Livingstone 26 rec 491 yds 6td 18.9 per catch

Mosley 23 rec 357 yds 3td 15.5 per catch

  • Hook 'Em 5
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Q said:

I see you just like to talk. All players stats last year so we can put this to bed. He's not that much better than what we already have, especially if we have to break the bank for it. If anything Mosley and Livingstone need more targets. 

Coleman 56 rec 708 yds 5td 12.6 per catch

Wingo 50 rec 770 yds 7td 15.4 per catch

Livingstone 26 rec 491 yds 6td 18.9 per catch

Mosley 23 rec 357 yds 3td 15.5 per catch

Stop looking at stat logs and actually watch the players play, look at who is throwing them the ball, etc. 

 

Wingo has yet to win a single 50/50 ball and it took him until the A&M game of this year to make his fist high point catch at Texas. 

Edited by FaxMachine
  • Moderators
Posted

I’d expect Alabama and Texas A&M to be heavily involved with Coleman. 

I don’t know about Texas’ involvement at the moment. 

  • Hook 'Em 4
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Q said:

I see you just like to talk. All players stats last year so we can put this to bed. He's not that much better than what we already have, especially if we have to break the bank for it. If anything Mosley and Livingstone need more targets. 

Coleman 56 rec 708 yds 5td 12.6 per catch

Wingo 50 rec 770 yds 7td 15.4 per catch

Livingstone 26 rec 491 yds 6td 18.9 per catch

Mosley 23 rec 357 yds 3td 15.5 per catch

Do you know who was throwing the ball to Cam 😂

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, EHoff99 said:

OL and RB are 100% more important needs and what the priority should be on offense.

With that being said, yall are insane if you think we don’t need an upgrade at WR. I do think all of Wingo, Livingstone, and Mosley will improve. Lockett, Ffrench, and McCutcheon could all become serviceable players.

We can’t risk and just hope on all of that though, and certainly can’t claim we’re “all in” by risking that. I don’t think we should overhaul the room or anything, but you only really need one WR out of the portal, especially if it’s a big time guy like Cam Coleman.

I don’t think we’ll get him, but some of yall acting as if we shouldn’t even be in the running is just insane to me.

You get more production from the TE position as we had in years past I would say we are fine with who we have at WR. You give a good QB time to throw the ball, he will find an open receiver. Job#1 is give the QB time by having a good OL and running game threat. This isn't complicated.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Longhornlove said:

You get more production from the TE position as we had in years past I would say we are fine with who we have at WR. You give a good QB time to throw the ball, he will find an open receiver. Job#1 is give the QB time by having a good OL and running game threat. This isn't complicated.

So did you purposefully ignore the first part of my post? OL is the priority, as I said. WR still needs to be upgraded.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

I’d expect Alabama and Texas A&M to be heavily involved with Coleman. 

I don’t know about Texas’ involvement at the moment. 

What’s the word on Caleb Hawkins? Texas showing interest?

Edited by EHoff99

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.