Roy Hinojosa Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? Edited 1 hour ago by Roy Hinojosa 2 Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, Roy Hinojosa said: I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? The reporting suggests that Texas BMDs remain squeamish about paying players. They want their names on buildings and love to ride the wave of Texas football success, but they have not fully adjusted to the new NIL reality. Until that changes, it will be hard to keep up with Oregon and Tech. Quote
Brian Richardson Posted 55 minutes ago Posted 55 minutes ago Hard to keep up? We just out recruited them pretty handily this year and last. 1 Quote
Cujonation83 Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago 36 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said: The reporting suggests that Texas BMDs remain squeamish about paying players. They want their names on buildings and love to ride the wave of Texas football success, but they have not fully adjusted to the new NIL reality. Until that changes, it will be hard to keep up with Oregon and Tech. This is not true at all. Texas will be fine 🙂. 1 Quote
antcan95 Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago Tech has 3-4 Ls with our schedule this year Quote
Jordan91 Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago 54 minutes ago, Roy Hinojosa said: I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? I always get the sense that some schools are waiting for a response from the NCAA, all schools have to follow, that will make it even. I don’t think it will ever come. The house committee meetings were pointless. Anything the NCAA comes up with is likely going to be challenged in the courts and they will lose. It needs to be solved legally at the highest court. Until that happens it will stay this way. Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Texas was nowhere near as brazen. 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago 54 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said: The reporting suggests that Texas BMDs remain squeamish about paying players. They want their names on buildings and love to ride the wave of Texas football success, but they have not fully adjusted to the new NIL reality. Until that changes, it will be hard to keep up with Oregon and Tech. Texas is lucky to have donors of all types. 3 Quote
horns96 Posted 18 minutes ago Posted 18 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Because we’re not Texas Tech. 1 Quote
SB21 Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Roy Hinojosa said: I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? I mean Campbell said it himself “this was their opportunity” and they jumped all in compared to us feeling like we didn’t need to take that exact same approach cause we had felt what winning felt like…. They hadn’t, until this opportunity gave them the chance to buy it. Legally lol Edited 7 minutes ago by SB21 Quote
HudGar1922 Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 32 minutes ago, antcan95 said: Tech has 3-4 Ls with our schedule this year yea but unfortunately we never dominated the big 12 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.