Waxahorn Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago The question is why didn't Texas do the same? 5 1 Quote
Roy Hinojosa Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? Edited 3 hours ago by Roy Hinojosa 1 2 Quote
Bunk Moreland Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Roy Hinojosa said: I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? The reporting suggests that Texas BMDs remain squeamish about paying players. They want their names on buildings and love to ride the wave of Texas football success, but they have not fully adjusted to the new NIL reality. Until that changes, it will be hard to keep up with Oregon and Tech. 1 Quote
Brian Richardson Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Hard to keep up? We just out recruited them pretty handily this year and last. 2 Quote
Cujonation83 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 36 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said: The reporting suggests that Texas BMDs remain squeamish about paying players. They want their names on buildings and love to ride the wave of Texas football success, but they have not fully adjusted to the new NIL reality. Until that changes, it will be hard to keep up with Oregon and Tech. This is not true at all. Texas will be fine 🙂. 1 Quote
Jordan91 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Roy Hinojosa said: I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? I always get the sense that some schools are waiting for a response from the NCAA, all schools have to follow, that will make it even. I don’t think it will ever come. The house committee meetings were pointless. Anything the NCAA comes up with is likely going to be challenged in the courts and they will lose. It needs to be solved legally at the highest court. Until that happens it will stay this way. Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Texas was nowhere near as brazen. 1 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said: The reporting suggests that Texas BMDs remain squeamish about paying players. They want their names on buildings and love to ride the wave of Texas football success, but they have not fully adjusted to the new NIL reality. Until that changes, it will be hard to keep up with Oregon and Tech. Texas is lucky to have donors of all types. 6 Quote
horns96 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Because we’re not Texas Tech. 1 1 Quote
SB21 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Roy Hinojosa said: I don't understand it either. Bobby always talks about revenue sharing and NIL where it hinders Texas, but teams like Tech don't have any issues. Texas doesn't have rich donors? I mean Campbell said it himself “this was their opportunity” and they jumped all in compared to us feeling like we didn’t need to take that exact same approach cause we had felt what winning felt like…. They hadn’t, until this opportunity gave them the chance to buy it. Legally lol Edited 1 hour ago by SB21 Quote
HudGar1922 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 32 minutes ago, antcan95 said: Tech has 3-4 Ls with our schedule this year yea but unfortunately we never dominated the big 12 Quote
Austalgia Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Because we are pansies. Quote
Waxahorn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 34 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said: Texas was nowhere near as brazen. So, Bobby would you say it was legal, illegal, underhanded or just shameless? Seems like Campbell is fairly proud of himself. Apparently, NIL didn't have limits in 2025. Quote
cmk4pres Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Exactly Quote
Raistlin Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 43 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said: Texas was nowhere near as brazen. Does “brazen” equal “timid”? Quote
TheContractor12 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 48 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said: Texas was nowhere near as brazen. Then that’s on us. We either want it and say F everyone or we are ok with 9-3/10-2. Quote
TheContractor12 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Waxahorn said: So, Bobby would you say it was legal, illegal, underhanded or just shameless? Seems like Campbell is fairly proud of himself. Apparently, NIL didn't have limits in 2025. There is no shame in winning. I agree, they have more losses with out schedule but they are doing what they need to, we are not yet. Let’s see if we do in the next 60 days. Quote
drag worm Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago We just missed the window where McCombs and Jamail would have been our “NIL Billionaires.” Mack would have won 7 natties with those dudes being able to buy rosters. Quote
FootLaw Posted 4 minutes ago Posted 4 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Waxahorn said: The question is why didn't Texas do the same? Their lawyers said "sue us". Our lawyers said "it depends". I agree with their lawyers BTW. College sports has a ways to go through the courts/congress. Take advantage while you can. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.