diegozanna20 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) It seems clear to me what the plan on defense is: - Aggression, energy, effort; - Man Coverage that ties well with the aggresive fronts. But what is the plan going to be on offense? Does Sark want to go back to the original plan at the start of the season (a lot of 12 personell, heavy run game up the middle tied up with play action, lot of 7 step drop PA concepts with Arch snapping the ball under center) or stick with the thing that seemingly worked really well for Arch (spread offense, get it out quick most of the time, lot of straight dropbacks with bunch formations, etc...)? I think it's very doable to tie in a more heavy downhill running game with what arch does best without having to resort to 12 personell sets (Do we have the guys for 12P?)... I guess it all comes down to what Sark thinks was the reason for the struggles early on... Was it Arch having the yips? Was it just because of the lackluster running game? Was it the OL? Were the passing concepts (Having an ADOT of 20 against Florida) too "bold" and unsustainable? We're probably going to get a better picture about what the plan is after the portal but for the most important thing is just having a clear cut idenity... doesn't matter what that identity is. Edited 1 hour ago by diegozanna20 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.