Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, diegozanna20 said:

He's already got the insurance with the Elon QB...
This guy is for 2027 I think.
Strange to not stay at USC cause you're not gonna play but go to LSU and not play... Unless he's told that he can compete for the starting job

Probably way better than eating more burnt brisket all off-season. LSU definitely has the better menu...🤣

Posted
1 hour ago, JTForPresident said:

Those in Favor say “I”

IMG_8310.jpeg

IMG_8311.jpeg

IMG_8312.jpeg

There has never been parity in college football. The current situation has actually allowed the college football with the most losses all time in D1 to compete for a national championship Monday night.

Posted
1 minute ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

 

IMG_0103.gif

Not sure this guy would be a good fit for us TBH. Stuff like this strikes me as someone who is chasing notoriety versus wins. Just my opinion, could be dead wrong. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Alex Butler said:

Not sure this guy would be a good fit for us TBH. Stuff like this strikes me as someone who is chasing notoriety versus wins. Just my opinion, could be dead wrong. 

Well he's gonna get notoriety with Arch as a QB lol... As long as he blocks for him 🤷‍♂️

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Sarah O said:

 

BTW this guy may be a good tackle and all but Coleman, another high profile recruit, never did any of this 💩...
People always assume receivers are divas but that guy played in a terrible Auburn offense and never complained.
Entered the portal and was professional the whole way.

Just saying, I would not be surprised if Seaton takes a visit and we end up not moving forward with him, regardless of talent.

Edited by diegozanna20
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
22 minutes ago, Alex Butler said:

Not sure this guy would be a good fit for us TBH. Stuff like this strikes me as someone who is chasing notoriety versus wins. Just my opinion, could be dead wrong. 

Not wrong. First Deion now Irvin

Posted
5 hours ago, PaulieD said:

Gerry, I laugh b/c people actually think that the cupboard is bare.  We don't have the insider knowledge the coaches have in the potential of the folks listed above, at least. not all of them.  Patience, grasshoppers.

Indiana fan here, I've watched your board over the past week for Brunner news.  I've also watched UT stack outstanding recruiting classes year-over-year.  In a sea of neurotic posts, PaulieD's post was one of the few that resonated with the vibe of Indiana's recruiting forums.  I've got to ask a few questions:

1) Do you have no confidence in your coaching staff and the OL underclassmen UT has recruited over the past several years?

2) Is the problem UT recruits well but sucks at player development?  

Prior to Brunner's IU visit, "insiders" mentioned he was ours to lose.  Brunner visited Indiana over a week ago and we've heard nothing about how the visit went.  Do you know how many Indiana fans have expressed concern in our forums?  There's not a single "sky is falling" post about potentially losing the only major OL transfer Indiana is targeting... and it's not because we are confident he will commit to Indiana.  We aren't worried because we are confident in the development of linemen who haven't even sniffed the field yet, and we trust the staff to go out and get someone if there actually is a gap on the line. 

Shifting gears a bit, we were relatively excited about the visit from former Texas RB C.J. Baxter.  He would have been part of a 4 RB committee if we signed him.  It sounds like he was ours if Cignetti wanted him... Cignetti passed.  For a little context, You have to understand Baxter would have been the first 5* in Indiana history.  The backlash from the Indiana fan base for not adding Baxter... none.  We trust our staff to identify if he would have been the right fit.

  • Sad 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.