Save College Sports Act

[Jordan91]

Restricting NIL will immediately be challenged in court. 

[HelloThere]

49 minutes ago, Jordan91 said:

Restricting NIL will immediately be challenged in court. 

Yep, and the only way it survives is some sort of antitrust exemption. Since I don't believe the legislation has any chance of passing, I have not read what antitrust exemptions they would include.  If they have those then it could pass the courts.

I have no problem with there being debate in Washington about this, especially considering local (school picked) judges are currently running college football.   My issue, like others have stated, is that government involvement never works out.  It just doesn't. 

That said, the nature of the courts involvement right now is never going to work out either. 

[TTown]

From Dellenger- 25 million retention pool $ + 5 mil for women. So 51 mil overall.But the kicker is they want to close loopholes on Associated Entities /MMR/ Sponsors etc. Worried about circumventing the Cap. Seems that will be a Court challenge for sure from athletes .

But the bill isn't finalized yet so the devil is in the  details. And even if the stars align in the Senate, good luck in the House. That's a whole different game with time ticking away .

[Bobby Burton]

3 hours ago, CutaneousHorn said:

Why is the president of the Yankees involved?

Exactly!

[Bobby Burton]

3 hours ago, Lnghrn said:

Bobby - any idea what is captured in the restrictive NIL language?  Not sure how you can restrict legit nil.   Generally UT is going to be in a good position with legit nil due to size of Austin, UT brand in Texas and nationally.  Hopefully this would get rid of schools that are calling crap nil that is really pay for play.  

Language is not finalized is my understanding. 

[MBHORNSFAN]

Hope it dies. 

[TTown]

2 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said:

Language is not finalized is my understanding. 

Agree . Seems Learfield has gotten all their deals for UT  through the Clearinghouse. I read that when they responded to Kessler trying to get Associated Entities more leeway.  Believe he didn't get that yet, but is still trying with the original judge on House Settlement.   Assume Nike and others we use have gotten deals through. 

So Texas should be in a good place, but still see litigation coming on that issue , again depending on what is in the Bill.