Jump to content
3 Months for $3 - Sign Up Here! ×

The latest LSU drama

Hank South
 Share

Recommended Posts

HonkEm All-American

HonkEm

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

 

Ou has added several in the last few days.

OU has added multiple former NFL guys this week, yes - but they ran every one of them through the SEC office and got them certified. LSU didn’t. LSU certified ineligible players, got told “no,” ignored it, and hid behind a judge. OU followed the process. LSU tried to override the conference. I’m not trying to argue with you, but just trying to lay out why the league sees these as two totally different situations. And i may be wrong.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Jordan Scruggs
Jordan Scruggs

Non-zero odds Brett Yormark has already made a call to LSU brass

Hank South
Hank South
Joe Z
Joe Z

Posted Images

4thandFive Lifetime Longhorn

4thandFive

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Jordan Scruggs said:

Non-zero odds Brett Yormark has already made a call to LSU brass

Cody doesn’t want LSU in the BigXII. They’d immediately win every year.

  • Hook 'Em 4
MBHORNSFAN Lifetime Longhorn

MBHORNSFAN

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, HonkEm said:

OU has added multiple former NFL guys this week, yes - but they ran every one of them through the SEC office and got them certified. LSU didn’t. LSU certified ineligible players, got told “no,” ignored it, and hid behind a judge. OU followed the process. LSU tried to override the conference. I’m not trying to argue with you, but just trying to lay out why the league sees these as two totally different situations. And i may be wrong.

Not sure how the SEC can see it different considering they just passed a bylaw that says no NFL players are allowed on rosters.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Horns05 Freshman

Horns05

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, HonkEm said:

OU has added multiple former NFL guys this week, yes - but they ran every one of them through the SEC office and got them certified. LSU didn’t. LSU certified ineligible players, got told “no,” ignored it, and hid behind a judge. OU followed the process. LSU tried to override the conference. I’m not trying to argue with you, but just trying to lay out why the league sees these as two totally different situations. And i may be wrong.

They also were both similar to Hutson as just mini camp attendees not training camp and preseason rosters. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 1
Glass Joe All-American

Glass Joe

Posted
Posted

Not a lawyer but I assume this amended filing in a federal court is to give Sankey / SEC full power superseding any future Louisiana state court rulings on the matter, and includes the punishment clause so that the same Louisiana court can’t TRO the SEC handing out that punishment.  Preemptive authority given to Sankey, including punishment.

  • Hook 'Em 1
HonkEm All-American

HonkEm

Posted
Posted

I’m really not trying to argue with anyone here, but guess i am 😀.  All i was thinking was -- why is the SEC  treating these differently?. The new bylaw does ban former NFL players, but OU has run every one of their recent additions through the SEC office and gotten them certified. LSU didn’t do that. LSU certified guys the SEC had already ruled ineligible, then used a judge to block enforcement.

And yeah, both sets of players were minicamp‑only like Hutson - but that’s not what the SEC is fighting about. The issue isn’t “were they minicamp or preseason,” it’s “did the school follow the SEC certification process or did they defy the league.” OU followed it. LSU tried to override it. That’s the whole difference.

This is just how I see it - not saying anyone else is right or wrong. I may even be wrong about all of this.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Waxahorn All-American

Waxahorn

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 4thandFive said:

Anybody else think LSU and Lane enjoy being the villains? 
 

At least it’s not Texas. I do not want that smoke.

Lane fits their mindset perfectly.

Sark Attack Redshirt

Sark Attack

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, Garrett Rapport said:

I don’t think they should kick LSU out, but I think this is more about asserting that they CAN if needed. 
 

Lane would be better off being a little less Lane, but they did look like a great team Saturday. 

Shouldn’t take kicking them out to curb the behavior. Suspend the coach and AD for an appropriate time frame and ban them from postseason play this year and then until they conform. After that you can dock their check from the league. Going nuclear is not a good option. Even if it ended up being necessary you start smaller and work up to it. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
MarkInAustin Lifetime Longhorn

MarkInAustin

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, 4thandFive said:

Cody doesn’t want LSU in the BigXII. They’d immediately win every year.

On the other hand...LSU and TT forming their own conference with their own rules?  They could add the very best state prison all star teams and the Arena teams to their schedules.  They could play in the Spring.  It might fill a niche.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Sad 1
  • Moderators
CJ Vogel Lifetime Longhorn

CJ Vogel

Posted
  • Moderators
Posted
13 minutes ago, Tuco Ramirez said:

Looks like Clemson picked the wrong year to crap the bed. 

That might just be how every year looks like for Clemson nowadays.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Sad 1
Realist Horn Lifetime Longhorn

Realist Horn

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, 4thandFive said:

Anybody else think LSU and Lane enjoy being the villains? 
 

See Michigan “Everyone against Us” mentality for its championship run. Yes, Lane loves it. 

HonkEm All-American

HonkEm

Posted
Posted

And honestly, this has been a great conversation. Everyone’s keeping it respectful and actually talking football instead of melting down. It’s refreshing. You don’t get many threads like this on Inside Texas - they’d already be throwing haymakers by now. Appreciate the solid dialog here.

No screaming, no ‘you’re an idiot,’ just actual discussion.

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
westx Freshman

westx

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

How is this different than what ou is doing? They have added several players that were on NFL rosters already.

I was not aware of this.  To what players are you referring?

MBHORNSFAN Lifetime Longhorn

MBHORNSFAN

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, westx said:

I was not aware of this.  To what players are you referring?

 

Do not know their names. But they have added several and plan on adding more apparently 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.