OTFBrandon Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago @Jeff Howe I’m going to ask you these quick questions because of how quick you got your thoughts out in the live thread during the game. What is this offense’s main issue? And how does it differ from years past with Sark? Why does it feel like we’re just consistent QB play away from winning it all? Quote
JMarquette Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Tres Comas said: Offense in general. Arch in specific. Did you watch the OL today? Arch had 0 time. Fine to be critical of arch, but he wasn’t the problem. 2 Quote
Connor Vaughn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Sark trying to square peg round hole Arch into being a pocket passer. 1 1 Quote
rgvhorn80 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago SARK is the issue. The offense is His responsibility. 3 Quote
Tres Comas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, JMarquette said: Did you watch the OL today? Arch had 0 time. Fine to be critical of arch, but he wasn’t the problem. Nonsense. Arch is in year 4 and is playing terribly. 1 Quote
JMarquette Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Connor Vaughn said: Sark trying to square peg round hole Arch into being a pocket passer. Said the exact same thing in the other thread. Quote
Tres Comas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, rgvhorn80 said: SARK is the issue. The offense is His responsibility. I agree with this 3 Quote
JMarquette Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Tres Comas said: Nonsense. Arch is in year 4 and is playing terribly. It’s crazy to me that you watched that game where arch had no time from an OL that was under duress the entire time and couldn’t run the ball, and you came out thinking arch was the main problem. 3 1 Quote
Chop Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago UTSA was Arch. This game was not. Tons of blitzing and then they seemed to only rush 3 so either no time to throw or no one could get open. This seemed to be a great game to run those screens Sarks to run and he never did Quote
4thandFive Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Arch was 14/19. He thew a ball into double coverage for an INT, but the offensive offense isn’t on Arch. He doesn’t call the plays or block. 1 Quote
Tres Comas Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Chop said: UTSA was Arch. This game was not. Tons of blitzing and then they seemed to only rush 3 so either no time to throw or no one could get open. This seemed to be a great game to run those screens Sarks to run and he never did My issue is the blitzes were obvious. He's unable or unwilling to check out of play calls. In year 4 that's not good. That also speaks to development which is why the questions really rest at Sark's feet. 2 Quote
CoachBobbyFinstock Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) It’s on Sarkisian. It begins and ends with him. Elite talent to work with. He refuses to get an OC. He kept Flood. There is no excuse to be this inept at times and with this much talent. Muschamp has an elite defense or better side of the ball in four games. Edited 1 hour ago by CoachBobbyFinstock 2 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago We are 4-0. Onward. We either get better or we will be sitting home again in December. 2 Quote
Levester White Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 34 minutes ago, Tres Comas said: Offense in general. Arch in specific. Arch doesn’t fit the offense. Sark needs to consider consulting his analyst or getting outside help. Right now, this is losing football. 1 Quote
RealLonghornJose Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago (edited) 38 minutes ago, 4thandFive said: Arch was 14/19. He thew a ball into double coverage for an INT, but the offensive offense isn’t on Arch. He doesn’t call the plays or block. Arch should throw that INT pass 10/10 times again, especially with Coleman’s catch radius ability it just didn’t go our way Edited 41 minutes ago by RealLonghornJose 1 Quote
rgvhorn80 Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago 23 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said: We are 4-0. Onward. We either get better or we will be sitting home again in December. Yawn 1 Quote
MBHORNSFAN Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, rgvhorn80 said: Yawn Keep me posted 1 Quote
CHorn427 Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago For everyone going doom and gloom- look around the country. How many programs are our level? I count 4: Ohio State, Notre Dame, Miami and UGA. Florida is one dimensional. We’ve had the toughest schedule in the country so far and have come out undefeated, a 3rd of the way through our schedule. The issues this game were the OL and Smothers being out. These types of wins are good- survived, but plenty to coach ups Tennessee revealed some weaknesses. Surprise, surprise. It’s a Jim Knowles defense with a hell of a D line Quote
Moderators Jeff Howe Posted 6 minutes ago Moderators Posted 6 minutes ago 1 hour ago, OTFBrandon said: @Jeff Howe I’m going to ask you these quick questions because of how quick you got your thoughts out in the live thread during the game. What is this offense’s main issue? And how does it differ from years past with Sark? Why does it feel like we’re just consistent QB play away from winning it all? Last week, I felt it was mostly on Arch. After the initial watch today, I put a lot of it on Sark. I don't know if he was trying to swerve Knowles or believed in what he was calling, but the three scoring drives (especially the two touchdown drives) looked drastically different than the rest of the game. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.