MarkInAustin Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I watched Joel Klatt on YouTube yesterday. He was grading QBs, and said Klubnik was the best returning QB. I have thought highly of Klubnik since his Westlake days and IIRC Gerry and Bobby and CJV think well of Klubnik now. Klatt thought that because he trusted Sark’s process and Arch’s dedication [along with Arch’s talent] that Arch would be the second best QB returning. Klatt said that he watched Washington State film for the entire season because he had to prep for being their Bowl game commentator, and he thought Mateer was the third best returning QB. To me, Klatt sounds reasonable and not like a hype machine. What is your take? Do you think Klatt is value added? Many of you here have opinions supported by football experience, which I do not, so I enjoy the community guidance about who are trustworthy football commentators and who are not. 7 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 6 hours ago Moderators Posted 6 hours ago I like Klatt and his approach I’m one that believes LaNorris Sellers should be higher on all these lists, but my concern is SoCar can’t put the dudes around him on offense 7 Quote
Migas & Fajitas Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 50 minutes ago, MarkInAustin said: I watched Joel Klatt on YouTube yesterday. He was grading QBs, and said Klubnik was the best returning QB. I have thought highly of Klubnik since his Westlake days and IIRC Gerry and Bobby and CJV think well of Klubnik now. Klatt thought that because he trusted Sark’s process and Arch’s dedication [along with Arch’s talent] that Arch would be the second best QB returning. Klatt said that he watched Washington State film for the entire season because he had to prep for being their Bowl game commentator, and he thought Mateer was the third best returning QB. To me, Klatt sounds reasonable and not like a hype machine. What is your take? Do you think Klatt is value added? Many of you here have opinions supported by football experience, which I do not, so I enjoy the community guidance about who are trustworthy football commentators and who are not. I like Klatt. He has always struck me as a less weaselly version of Neuheisel. 3 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I like Klatt. I’ll often watch his YouTube channel during the season. 1 Quote
Fritztownhorn Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I like Klatt. He seems to talk of Texas with respect and honesty, not a sunshine either. 3 Quote
jonbailey Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Of the sports pundits covering college football, i trust Klatt more than most of the others. His analysis is reason based as opposed to narrative based. Most of his takes are either correct or reasonably correct based on available information. Quote
Moderators Jeff Howe Posted 2 hours ago Moderators Posted 2 hours ago Joel Klatt. Na-na-na-na-na. Joel Klatt. 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I think Klubnik is a very good player. I just don’t think he’s a 1-1. But I still don’t see that in Cam Ward either. 1 Quote
ArizonaLonghorn Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, MarkInAustin said: To me, Klatt sounds reasonable and not like a hype machine. What is your take? Do you think Klatt is value added? I agree with you on this. He seems pretty even handed about Texas even though I think he was the Colorado QB in the 70-0 beat down, right? The other guy I like is Josh Pate even though I think there are a lot of guys who don't like him. The list of guys I wouldn't listen to is lengthy but these two, to use your term, offer 'value added'. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.