Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Kid was bought  plain and simple.

It looks really foolish when you have a school that’s had 5 RBs drafted in the last few years and has the most Doak Walker award winners.

This doesn’t include Texas has been to the semi’s the last two years and will be in the hunt again. He would also join Dia Bell in the backfield in this class.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
20 minutes ago, Hashtag said:

But what if we close on equally ranked OOS RB?

F that, gotta do what it takes to get Zach Evans instead of settling on Bijan Robinson.

  • Haha 5
Posted
3 hours ago, JMarquette said:

Sark & returning coaches have earned our trust recruiting, LaAllen Clark & Orphey have done a really good job. 
 

Chad Scott is an unproven commodity at this point as Texas’s recruiter of running backs, and that is concerning. 

It’s MONEY not Chad Scott

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Nobody is off the board, y'all can b***h because we’re reactionary and it’s fun but you can’t honestly believe any of these cats are sewn up. If Crowell commits to Bama in a week, not sewn up. Hell Osborne isn’t sewn up. It is June. Calm your t*ts. It says more about A&M that they have to go shock and awe with these dudes in June, they have nothing to sell. 
 

“After we go 8&4 and you go undrafted you could work for our dear friends in Qatar.”

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
4 hours ago, thatdude2 said:

And we still signed a better receiving class than Oregon.

Major facts.. and now DK will not have the luxury of a top notch guy on the other side like he would've here. With Stewart down... who else scares you that had done it over there? Even if Moore goes down... you got Wingo, and vice versa, here at Texas, plus a plethora of talented guys that wouldn't allow him to be Public Enemy #1. I depend on Sark scheming me open more than anybody else in college football not named Lincoln Riley.

 

Crazy work.. but that's why I say.. Trust in Sark. 

  • Hook 'Em 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.