TexasFanatic Posted yesterday at 08:17 PM Posted yesterday at 08:17 PM (edited) Edited yesterday at 08:17 PM by TexasFanatic 1 5 Quote
TexasFanatic Posted yesterday at 08:18 PM Author Posted yesterday at 08:18 PM How does this help/hurt Texas? 1 1 Quote
Burnt Orange Horn Posted yesterday at 08:21 PM Posted yesterday at 08:21 PM (edited) First question, is this even a valid order? I thought Congress administered monopoly exempt entities? Edited yesterday at 08:21 PM by Burnt Orange Horn 1 Quote
Weino Posted yesterday at 08:21 PM Posted yesterday at 08:21 PM (edited) 4 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: How does this help/hurt Texas? It helps Texas, who has unlimited brands around the state that want to see Texas succeed. It hurts smaller schools unless they have students take out ads. but let’s be real, there will continue to be a workaround, and this may not even hold up in any sort of court. Edited yesterday at 08:22 PM by Weino 3 Quote
TexasFanatic Posted yesterday at 08:24 PM Author Posted yesterday at 08:24 PM Just now, Weino said: It helps Texas, who has unlimited brands around the state that want to see Texas succeed. It hurts smaller schools with wealthy alumni unless they have students take out ads. but let’s be real, there will continue to be a workaround, and this may not even hold up in any sort of court. I thought this meant brands can’t pay athletes so that hurts what you just said? Or do collectives mean “third party” Losing collectives hurts Texas a lot… Quote
Weino Posted yesterday at 08:26 PM Posted yesterday at 08:26 PM (edited) 2 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: I thought this meant brands can’t pay athletes so that hurts what you just said? Or do collectives mean “third party” Losing collectives hurts Texas a lot… The executive order prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments but “does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement,” according to the White House’s release. Basically actual NIL is still fine, but collectives will not be (but they will because this won’t matter since courts will have a lot to say) Edited yesterday at 08:28 PM by Weino Quote
TexasFanatic Posted yesterday at 08:30 PM Author Posted yesterday at 08:30 PM 2 minutes ago, Weino said: The executive order prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments but “does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement,” according to the White House’s release. Basically actual NIL is still fine, but collectives will not be (but they will because this won’t matter since courts will have a lot to say) But there is still a FMV limit in these brand deals… We will see if it helps Texas or not. Quote
FatherofMinky Posted yesterday at 08:31 PM Posted yesterday at 08:31 PM (edited) I don’t see any way that this executive order is gonna stand. I won’t be surprised if some district judge somewhere issues an injunction on it by this evening. Here come the law suits. Edited yesterday at 08:32 PM by FatherofMinky 6 1 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM CDC has talked in the past about internalizing the collective so that could be one work around. However, none of this makes a poop until we get through years of litigation. 1 Quote
FootLaw Posted yesterday at 08:35 PM Posted yesterday at 08:35 PM 17 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Good luck. An EO isn't law. This likely gets shot down in Court relatively quick. 2 4 Quote
Hashtag Posted yesterday at 08:35 PM Posted yesterday at 08:35 PM It's honestly a nothing burger EO. So long as 3rd party entities like TOF have specific appearances, recordings, and objectives they have to reach to get their NIL deal it should be good to go as they are not pay for play "technically." 6 Quote
Hashtag Posted yesterday at 08:35 PM Posted yesterday at 08:35 PM Just now, Tuco Ramirez said: CDC has talked in the past about internalizing the collective so that could be one work around. However, none of this makes a poop until we get through years of litigation. You DO NOT want TOF as part of the schools money. It would restrict us. Quote
connorkp23 Posted yesterday at 08:48 PM Posted yesterday at 08:48 PM Sounds quite similar to what the House settlement already outlines unless I am missing something... more of a marketing play by Trump than anything of consequence 2 Quote
tfoster40 Posted yesterday at 08:58 PM Posted yesterday at 08:58 PM 9 minutes ago, connorkp23 said: Sounds quite similar to what the House settlement already outlines unless I am missing something... more of a marketing play by Trump than anything of consequence that’s what I thought to be interesting to hear what Bobby says about it tomorrow morning 2 Quote
TexasFanatic Posted yesterday at 08:59 PM Author Posted yesterday at 08:59 PM All I want to hear is that Texas will still be the king for this new era 1 Quote
Bobby Burton Posted yesterday at 09:00 PM Posted yesterday at 09:00 PM 32 minutes ago, Weino said: The executive order prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments but “does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement,” according to the White House’s release. Basically actual NIL is still fine, but collectives will not be (but they will because this won’t matter since courts will have a lot to say) It doesn’t say anything about collectives. 5 Quote
Moderators Jeff Howe Posted yesterday at 10:04 PM Moderators Posted yesterday at 10:04 PM 19 minutes ago, THookem said: Yes, point the finger at Texas, because the upstanding schools of the SEC did everything above board before NIL. The butthurt is strong. 10 1 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted yesterday at 10:13 PM Posted yesterday at 10:13 PM 7 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said: Yes, point the finger at Texas, because the upstanding schools of the SEC did everything above board before NIL. The butthurt is strong. 2 Quote
Moderators Jeff Howe Posted yesterday at 10:13 PM Moderators Posted yesterday at 10:13 PM Just now, Tuco Ramirez said: The TransA&M 2 7 Quote
HDub1995 Posted yesterday at 11:20 PM Posted yesterday at 11:20 PM Yeah, that’s not how that works. Executive Orders are not binding law. They can try all they want, the genie is not going back in the bottle. 2 2 Quote
whereiend Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 2 hours ago, Hashtag said: You DO NOT want TOF as part of the schools money. It would restrict us. The day TOF goes straight to the AD is the day I stop contributing. The AD needs to fund the $20M on their own from ticket sales, media payouts, etc. The purpose of TOF is to be additional compensation beyond the $20M. 1 Quote
f1revo Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago This dudes attempt to rule by EO is sad and funny. Still no enforcement mechanism so toss it out and move on. Loser is on the fast track to add to his 34 felonies as information releases anyways. 4 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.