Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

@Jeff Howe, any chance we can get a thread on the board for Second Watch (or whatever it's going to be called going forward)?

It's one of my favorite OTF features.

I know y'all can't share video, but it would be awesome if you could reference game clock times for specific formations, schemes etc.

I ask, because Rod mentioned 14 personnel and I totally missed that watching in DKR and when I watched the ABC broadcast.

...whatever the case, great content.🤘

 

 

Edited by horns96
Posted
41 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said:

It was Texas lined up on 1-yard line with Townsend in the backfield. 

Funny thing about that play - we had 10 men on the field

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Bobby Burton said:

It was Texas lined up on 1-yard line with Townsend in the backfield. 

I just finished the State of the Program video and immediately went to watch the run game. The run game flaws were do to running back vision just as much if not more than blocking. We missed Wisner that game. On the second drive of the game, I forget which back was in, but on 1st and 10 we gain 2 yards where if the back cuts outside between the TE/T it's blocked for 5-7 yards.  The next play the line gets push but the back is dancing in the whole instead on putting his foot in the ground. He gained 5, where Tre would have gotten 15. There's many like that throughout the game. The line whiffed here and in on run blocks, but it was better than most give credit for. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Dread-headed Texan said:

I just finished the State of the Program video and immediately went to watch the run game. The run game flaws were do to running back vision just as much if not more than blocking. We missed Wisner that game. On the second drive of the game, I forget which back was in, but on 1st and 10 we gain 2 yards where if the back cuts outside between the TE/T it's blocked for 5-7 yards.  The next play the line gets push but the back is dancing in the whole instead on putting his foot in the ground. He gained 5, where Tre would have gotten 15. There's many like that throughout the game. The line whiffed here and in on run blocks, but it was better than most give credit for. 

After all the talk we heard about Clark being explosive and looking good, his actual play was just bad. He had holes and creases, but he danced around and got tackled. Hopefully it was a literal jitters thing and he'll actually run up field. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

After all the talk we heard about Clark being explosive and looking good, his actual play was just bad. He had holes and creases, but he danced around and got tackled. Hopefully it was a literal jitters thing and he'll actually run up field. 

Tre would of had 130 easy that game. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, harveycmd said:

Do we know what is keeping Wisner out? I know they said lower leg, but that's pretty general.

We won't know until SEC play Sark isn't going to give us much. But I don't expect many explosive runs until he comes back, Baxter isn't an explosive back he's a bruiser and inside/gap scheme back. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, gocfred said:

James Simon is. That is one back we need to see early if we want to identify a backup to Wisner. 

Vision is something you have or you don't. If Simon has it, contrary to how many here feel here, this is the line you want to run behind. 🤣 Arch however, may have nightmares for awhile.

Posted

re: clark, i'm hoping it was first game jitters.  Gerry said he had the most violent one-cut ability of any of the backs we had last year.  That was pre-injury, so hopefully, it will come back as he gets more comfortable.  wouldn't give up on him just yet, but hopefully, james simon gets some touches as well!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.