Realist Horn Posted Friday at 04:22 PM Posted Friday at 04:22 PM Several players have redshirted after the firing of the coach with the intention to preserve a year for when they portal. If the redshirt is the players choice, and not from the school, that to me is akin to "opting out" and thus, I am not sure if I have an issue withholding the payments. 1 Quote
Tuco Ramirez Posted Friday at 04:33 PM Posted Friday at 04:33 PM This should be pretty straightforward depending on the language in the contracts. On the surface, I don’t have a problem with a school not paying someone for not working, but the school can’t unilaterally enforce that unless the contract allows it. However, to call it fraudulent misrepresentation seems excessive. 3 Quote
HDub1995 Posted Friday at 04:35 PM Posted Friday at 04:35 PM It depends on the way VT wrote their contracts. Now, you’re going to see players negotiate for additional clauses if the head coach leaves. It’s already a way to enter the portal. I get VT’s argument, but I’m not sure it meets the spirit of the bylaw they are citing. Heitner is already bringing suit against them. We’ll see. Quote
Bobby Burton Posted Friday at 04:39 PM Posted Friday at 04:39 PM These NIL rev share contracts can NOT be pay for play. Yet those are the grounds Va Tech is using to stop payment. Again, the charade has to stop. 8 1 Quote
Stuey22 Posted Friday at 05:11 PM Posted Friday at 05:11 PM 29 minutes ago, Bobby Burton said: These NIL rev share contracts can NOT be pay for play. Yet those are the grounds Va Tech is using to stop payment. Again, the charade has to stop. Then what can the schools do? It’s disingenuous to say all the hypocrisy is on the schools. These kids have put in their 2 week notice and expect to be paid for the rest of the year. 5 Quote
harveycmd Posted Friday at 05:18 PM Posted Friday at 05:18 PM 5 minutes ago, Stuey22 said: Then what can the schools do? It’s disingenuous to say all the hypocrisy is on the schools. These kids have put in their 2 week notice and expect to be paid for the rest of the year. The schools need to make them employees if they want to legally treat them like employees. Part of the stupidity of the SCORE Act is it would prevent student-athletes from "ever" being employees. It makes no sense. 3 Quote
Inspired73 Posted Friday at 05:48 PM Posted Friday at 05:48 PM Sounds to me like VT has some serious money issues......as do a lot of other schools. They just happen to be the first using this approach. As I said several months ago, the UIL/money grab is going to create a 2 tiered Division 1. It will probably end up structures something similar to English soccer league where it is 2 tiered. Quote
brianb722 Posted Friday at 05:50 PM Posted Friday at 05:50 PM 35 minutes ago, Stuey22 said: Then what can the schools do? It’s disingenuous to say all the hypocrisy is on the schools. These kids have put in their 2 week notice and expect to be paid for the rest of the year. Based on your analogy then the players should be allowed to leave and play somewhere else in 2 weeks. But they're not. Quote
Oldest Horn Posted Friday at 06:05 PM Posted Friday at 06:05 PM If they’re opting out and refusing to play then withholding their money is truly justified. 6 Quote
A-10HORN Posted Friday at 08:06 PM Posted Friday at 08:06 PM 2 hours ago, Oldest Horn said: If they’re opting out and refusing to play then withholding their money is truly justified. Agree. Looking at it beyond just “what does the contract say” if players want to leave they shouldn’t get paid for just sitting on their ass. 1 Quote
ArizonaLonghorn Posted Friday at 08:26 PM Posted Friday at 08:26 PM 2 hours ago, Inspired73 said: As I said several months ago, the UIL/money grab is going to create a 2 tiered Division 1. You could probably make a solid argument that it's already 3 tiered - those with near-zero hope of making the playoff (half? more?), those with a chance every few years if things break right for them, and the 15-20 true heavyweights whose fan bases will be angry if they are NOT in the running for the CFP at least every couple years. 1 Quote
Stuey22 Posted yesterday at 03:42 AM Posted yesterday at 03:42 AM 9 hours ago, brianb722 said: Based on your analogy then the players should be allowed to leave and play somewhere else in 2 weeks. But they're not. If you’re gonna be that literal then you should know if they could do that, they would do that. Mid semester be damned…it’s big time college athletics, what am academics? Quote
AusMOJO Posted yesterday at 09:34 AM Posted yesterday at 09:34 AM It seems in giving power to the players, we've taken all the power from the schools. I've no problem with them doing any of this. You're going out of your way to red shirt, why should you get paid? The players can't have everything working in their favor, there has to be some give and take. Quote
Steamboat Willie Posted yesterday at 02:38 PM Posted yesterday at 02:38 PM So soon-to-be former Hokie players are redshirting prior to making their portal escape? Makes perfect sense! Meanwhile, the athletic department is floundering around trying to enforce NIL deals like a toddler with a crayon. If Va. Tech thinks they’re going to enforce their will on players to escape this mess, they might want to think again. At this point, the only things heading to Virginia Tech are going to be legal bills and courtroom losses. Quote
HudGar1922 Posted yesterday at 02:38 PM Posted yesterday at 02:38 PM i like it you are quitting so checks quit coming Quote
Glass Joe Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago And then VT goes on the road and beats a 3-1 NC State team. Good on you, Hokies players! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.