Jump to content

Hashtag

Supporters
  • Posts

    2337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hashtag

  1. This is our depth next season. Gullette is the great unknown if he will stay with program or progress enough to be a contributor. So outside of Hill, Lefau, and Smith we basically only have 2 true freshmen. My question would be do we only need 1 LB from portal or should we get 2 for depth purposes?
  2. Keep Klub in the pocket, don't let him beat you with his legs....that's the key.
  3. It’s because Quinn is a 1 read QB
  4. Heard him and Big Bill are really good friends.....
  5. I don't think one has entered that I'd truly go after yet. Oatis isn't good and has regressed....he'll be ranked high in portal simply based of his HS ranking.
  6. Yup, he always says we should do XYZ after the fact but when it comes to it he never does. If Arch isn’t getting 10-20 snaps vs Clemson especially in the red zone that’s failure from Sark imo
  7. And that won’t cut it when trying to win a national championship in the playoff.
  8. Why don’t we? It’s the easiest way to upgrade that position with experience
  9. ND, Clemson, Oregon, Penn St, Ohio State, Bama, and Tennessee all have really good fronts.
  10. Surely after 9 weeks of wishing this it will come true.
  11. And beck has led them to victories in multiple games including games where they have trailed. Has Quinn?
  12. Beck is most certainly a better pick than Quinn for the NFL.
  13. I’d bet Beck is selected before Quinn.
  14. Vs Kentucky he was injured and so ineffective we had no choice but to run. Giving up a touchdown on a fumble. vs Arkansas he was ineffective so we had to run vs Vandy he was ineffective and we didn’t really move the ball rushing either. vs A&M he was ineffective and we had to run. Including two turnovers and throwing a pick 6 He’s been god awful in second half of games down the stretch of the last 6 games with or without context.
  15. A truly good QB shouldn’t need the most perfect of circumstances or situations to be successful.
  16. The o line was clicking vs Arkansas and A&M and the struggles were there including turnovers.
  17. I saw this on another site but it’s not for red zone but rather second half. When you pair his red zone struggles with second half struggles it’s really bad performance.
  18. Everything leading up to today is rankings for a tv show and to get engagement. Today is about seeding for a playoff. Don’t conflate those two things.
  19. That’s not necessarily true with how they have the tie ins for byes. If it was truly based on rankings then Arizona st and Boise state wouldn’t be 3/4. I think they’ll present the bracket in a way that seeds similar to cbb selections then will do like a first 4 out kind of thing.
  20. Arizona St is the 4 seed. I said in the other thread these rankings today will reflect seeding, not rankings imo. The South Carolina team didn’t play or win a conference championship
  21. Giving a conference champion a huge data point is justification enough over a team who did not participate in the conference championship and lost to the only ranked team they played.
  22. I initially had Indiana at 10 but I think the committee is going to want to avoid conference matchups in 1st round so my prediction bakes that in a little bit. I think ND will get 5 seed because it’s a 1 loss team and technically giving Penn St or Texas home games in opening round isn’t “penalizing” them for playing in CCG.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.