Neil Leininger

More like Texas dodged a couple of bullets. Sprague graded out with a 59.2 on 51 snaps Guarnera was worse. Texas got better players in Siani and Seymore.

Typical 1st game overreactions due to an OL that had played 0 combined snaps together in this configuration against live bullets. Ohio State had 15 attempts for 47 yards, with a long of 11 in their 1st half against Ball State, and their OL had much more playing time together than ours.

Got it, you expect perfection on every play in every game.

Depends, was the woman his married secretary?

Yes, because all our OL should be able to block 3-4 people at the same time. I don't think some people actually watch the games to see what the other team is doing against basic plays.

This was also the last play the Texas State 1st team offense played in this game. Kinne understood that he has a long season and plenty left to play for and didn't want to take any more chances on injuries that could ruin his season.

Clemson, Michigan, and Tech are in trouble because they don't have a QB worth a crap. You can have all the talent in the world at WR but without a QB getting them the ball it doesn't matter. Same with aggy as well, their WR group should be really good, but they can only carry Reed so far.

Their OL is trash and their QB is still really bad. ASU is going to give them all they can handle next weekend. That team has real skill position speed, a QB being coached up by a great coach, and a competent offensive scheme.

It was a bad decision, but he threaded the needle to Wingo the play before for what should have been a TD. The sack on the same drive was also a really bad decision in what a great game for him overall. That was like a 20 yard loss in rushing yards, becase he easily had at least 10 yards if he had just ran the ball.

and Michigan might shut them out as well. Western Michigan would likely beat the poop out of UTEP as well.

They have a couple of running threats, something they didn't have last year. Lots of over reactions from week one.

ou can't run the ball, they aren't spanking anyone this year.

8-4 might be tough for aggy this season.

Yeah, we didn't press at all.

An offense like Texas State is like facing the triple option. You get through it, and move on. Though I think Tennessee runs a version of it, but not to the extremes that Texas State does.

At least I am not illiterate.

How can you misspell Seymore's name when it is listed on the depth chart?

Lane really going to get LSU kicked out of the SEC.

Same play call as last year against Ohio State, except Arch doesn't throw a carpet missle and it becomes an explosive play to either Coleman or Wingo.

Given Sarkisian's stance, if the SEC said no to Hutson, Texas would have removed him from the roster already. He never entered the draft as an underclassmen, signed a NFL contract, or competing on a NFL roster. He also, never left school and isn't transfering from another conference school.

For me, this season is about penalties. Sarkisian's teams have gotten worse every year, that needs to change to make a run into and through the CFPs. I think going from #132 down into the top 50s would mean Texas is handling the flags giving their uber-talented squad more chances to make game-changing plays and burying teams.

From the ESPN article, this was one of his simulations. This is laughably bad. SEC standings Missouri 8-1 (11-1) South Carolina 8-1 (11-1) Georgia 6-3 (9-3) Tennessee 6-3 (9-3) Ole Miss 6-3 (9-3) Oklahoma 6-3 (8-4) LSU 5-4 (8-4) Auburn 5-4 (8-4) Texas 5-4 (7-5) Vanderbilt 5-4 (6-6) Alabama 4-5 (7-5) Texas A&M 3-6 (6-6) Kentucky 3-6 (5-7) Florida 2-7 (4-8) Mississippi State 1-8 (3-9) Arkansas 0-9 (2-10)

These rankings are trash since the advent of the portal.

Over the course of the summer, I worked with ChatGPT to create a ranking engine based on four core principles. 1. Reume - Overall body of work in the context of schedule difficulty; Who did you play, and what did you accomplish against them? 2. Quality Wins - The valie of a team's strongest victories; How strong are the teams you defeated? 3. Dominance - How convincingly a team performs relative to opponent quality; How well did you perform, not simply how much did you win by? 4. Consistency - The stability and repatability of performance; Does the team consistently perform at a high level? Now this isn't meant to predict future performance, it's meant to judge all teams equally against how they actually played. I try to minimize subjective influence, such as, preseason polls, recruiting rankings, brand recognition, historical prestige, media expectations, or perceived talent. Here are the Top 25's from the past 5 seasons. Yes, I am a nerd.