Jump to content

harveycmd

Members
  • Posts

    1083
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by harveycmd

  1. I'm not trusting anyone, but you can't make a definitive judgment in the absence of solid empirical or logical proof. Therefore the most logical conclusion is to avoid judgment. Why is that hard to understand?
  2. I don't trust anyone on faith alone. I certainly don't trust your statements about Beard's culpability. Why would would I? Basic epistemological honesty requires empirical and logical evidence. We don't have empirical evidence. Logical evidence is mixed because stories changed and charges were dropped. Our AD and administration aren't epistemic stalwarts in this case because they haven't given us the information or evidence to prove their credibility in this matter.
  3. You are assuming there was a "perpetrator." That's the question. You don't know. Stop acting like you have perfect knowledge of the situation. I don't. You don't.
  4. We seem to be dealing with CNN here. Was domestic violence proven?
  5. You're saying their investigation superseded the statements of the parties involved? Again, charges were recanted and dropped. I didn't know CDC was clairvoyant.
  6. That's true, but he was punished by the Texas administration because they were worried about political backlash. And again, since when is the standard that we just assume we must punish without definitive evidence? Common sense plays a role, but we have nothing there to determine Beard's culpability in this case.
  7. I can't prove a negative. You can't either. We don't know for sure what happened.
  8. That's up to him. Charges were dropped. I don't know about his transgressions. You don't either. CDC doesn't know for sure. Again, he's not guilty until proven innocent. He didn't kill anyone. He didn't maim anyone.
  9. The confusion is about contemporary politically correct standards and competence coaching college sports. I'm not confused about the two. I'm not confused about the disposition of eternal souls. Like Sark, Beard didn't commit an unforgivable eternal sin. Media crap doesn't cloud my judgment on such matters. Do you need rehab?
  10. I don't need clarification. History doesn't change in six years. Will Rodney Terry be better suited to be head coach of the Texas Longhorns men's basketball team in six years? I doubt it. Sark was calling a national championship game for Alabama the next year. Does that clarify things?
  11. I didn't ask. I said Sark deserved a second chance. Beard didn't deserve to be fired for contemporary prejudice about domestic matters. A few here think he did. I chalk that up to Austin left nonsense.
  12. Beard didn't have to enter rehab. Lefty nutjobs on the Cormac McCarthy board in 2003 were more logical than this.
  13. My favorite character in Quentin Tarantino's "Reservoir Dogs" is Buscemi as Mr. Pink.
  14. Overruled. Socrates died to prove his point that common opinion about contemporary hot pints didn't supersede truth in 399 BC. Hasn't changed in 2025.
  15. I'm a zeta. I just served on a jury last week. Everything I hear here is the opposite of what I was told by the judge to do there.
  16. We have guilty until proven innocent with you guys.
  17. I've never been cool. Reminds of June 2020.
  18. Do you go to Ole Miss games to protest?
  19. Our football coach showed up drunk for work at USC. He deserved another chance. He's proven himself. My point is that Beard wasn't worse.
  20. If that's the standard, we have what we deserve.
  21. CDC didn't hire Sark. Eltife wanted Sark.
  22. Are we living in a woke state here?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.