Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think people need to take a deep breath about the WR situation. Yes, Texas should take a WR. Does it have to be a Cam Coleman caliber player? No. Yall forget Matthew Golden was barely a top 10 WR in the portal and was still elite. It’s an expensive position and Sark knows what he needs every time he picks one up 

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 817 Boxing B said:

Chambliss has eligibility issues.. that's why he's going in another direction. He may not get granted another year because of his.juco situation previously. Rather than hope for a last minute decision on paperwork that was filed, if I'm not mistaken, either before this season started, or somewhere within it. The NCAA hasn't even acknowledged it to rule on.

Or...here me out on this...Chambliss is gonna announce his transfer on an AT&T commercial.

  • Haha 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, hookem1014 said:

Sark knows what he needs every time he picks one up 

That’s where you’re going completely wrong with many on this board unfortunately. There’s a huge population that think they know ball better than our coaching staff. You can see it ALL over this thread of who we should take and if we don’t we’re not “all in” 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Beard N Balls Bundle said:

Conner Robertson is our answer at center if he comes back

No he’s not. All in does not equal Connor Robertson in your starting lineup. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Thorn007 said:

 

Not happening. Lawsuits ensure you can’t go back. What’s funny is back in 2021, all the coaches were behind the effort to get unlimited transfers because they thought they would benefit from it. Here we are. 

Posted
3 hours ago, TexasFanatic said:

FYI Sark didn’t think we needed OL last year. He isn’t perfect. 

That is not entirely true. UT did look at a few OL prospects but they didn’t work out for whatever reason. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Robert Gilbert said:

That is not entirely true. UT did look at a few OL prospects but they didn’t work out for whatever reason. 

Too bad Sark was away from the program during the first portal window. 

  • Confused 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Realist Horn said:

Could be the answer at center…

 

Should be our highest priority for the center position. Best center prospect in the portal currently. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, FaxMachine said:

Should be our highest priority for the center position. Best center prospect in the portal currently. 

Him and that Colorado State one are a pretty good option. That G I saw earlier from East Carolina looks like a good G option, too. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.